Kobayakawa Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Clinic, 1969 Kunou, Fukuroi, Shizuoka 437-0061, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
Bone. 2022 Sep;162:116480. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116480. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
Romosozumab is a potent drug for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis but has a limited dosing period of 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) decreases soon after romosozumab discontinuation, thus emphasizing the importance of appropriate sequential treatment. The present VICTOR randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of ibandronate and denosumab as sequential therapy options following 12-month romosozumab treatment. Subjects completing 12 months of romosozumab administration for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive either ibandronate or denosumab for an additional 12 months. The primary outcome of interest was the percentage changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck from 12 months (completion of romosozumab) to 18 and 24 months of total treatment (6 and 12 months, respectively, after the conversion to sequential therapy). Secondary outcomes included alterations in serum bone turnover markers and the incidence of adverse events. Sixty-two subjects each in the ibandronate and denosumab groups completed the sequential therapy. The respective percentage changes in BMD at the lumbar spine from 12 months to 24 months were 2.5 % in the ibandronate group and 5.4 % in the denosumab group. At 24 months, we observed significant differences versus 12 months for both groups as well as between the groups (all P < 0.01), showing a superior ability to increase BMD at the lumbar spine for denosumab over ibandronate. BMD gains at the total hip and femoral neck exhibited comparably favorable trends. P1NP and TRACP-5b were significantly decreased from 12 to 24 months (-64.9 % and - 26.8 % in the ibandronate group and - 67.4 % and - 36.3 % in the denosumab group, respectively; all P < 0.001 versus 12 months). Several minor adverse events were recorded in both groups, none of which led to the discontinuation of the trial. The VICTOR study revealed that denosumab could be considered more effective than ibandronate, with few severe adverse events, for the enhancement of BMD as a sequential agent after romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients.
罗莫佐单抗是一种治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的强效药物,但治疗周期有限,仅为 12 个月。罗莫佐单抗停药后骨密度(BMD)会迅速下降,因此强调了适当序贯治疗的重要性。本项 VICTOR 随机对照研究比较了伊班膦酸盐和地舒单抗作为罗莫佐单抗治疗 12 个月后的序贯治疗选择的疗效。完成罗莫佐单抗治疗 12 个月严重绝经后骨质疏松症的受试者被随机分配接受伊班膦酸盐或地舒单抗治疗 12 个月。主要终点是从 12 个月(罗莫佐单抗治疗结束)到总治疗 18 个月和 24 个月(分别为转换为序贯治疗后 6 个月和 12 个月)时腰椎、全髋和股骨颈 BMD 的百分比变化。次要终点包括血清骨转换标志物的变化和不良事件的发生率。伊班膦酸盐组和地舒单抗组各有 62 名受试者完成了序贯治疗。伊班膦酸盐组腰椎 BMD 从 12 个月到 24 个月的百分比变化为 2.5%,地舒单抗组为 5.4%。24 个月时,与 12 个月时相比,两组均有显著差异,两组之间也有显著差异(均 P<0.01),表明地舒单抗增加腰椎 BMD 的能力优于伊班膦酸盐。全髋和股骨颈的 BMD 增加均表现出相似的有利趋势。从 12 个月到 24 个月,I 型原胶原氨基端延长肽(P1NP)和抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶 5b(TRACP-5b)分别显著下降(伊班膦酸盐组分别下降 64.9%和 26.8%,地舒单抗组分别下降 67.4%和 36.3%;均 P<0.001)。两组均记录了少数轻微不良事件,均未导致试验中断。VICTOR 研究表明,在绝经后骨质疏松症患者中,地舒单抗作为罗莫佐单抗的序贯药物,可考虑比伊班膦酸盐更有效,且不良事件较少。