Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
West China Brain Research Centre, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
J Headache Pain. 2022 Sep 8;23(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01472-2.
The relative effects of monoclonal antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor for adult migraine patients with prior treatment failure remains uncertain. Therefore, this study systematically assessed the comparative effectiveness of different CGRP binding monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for these patients.
Several online databases including Ovid MEDILNE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to June 15, 2022. We included randomized clinical trials (RCT) of adult migraine patients with previous treatment failure that assessed any CGRP monoclonal antibody. The primary efficacy outcome was change in monthly migraine days (MMDs), and the primary safety outcome was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Overall, seven studies totaling 3, 052 patients were included. Three-node analysis showed that CGRP mAbs was superior to CGRP receptor mAbs in reducing MMDs (MD: -1.55, 95% CrI: - 2.43 to - 0.44) and improving at least 50% response rates (RR: 1.52, 95% CrI: 1.04 to 2.21). Nine-node analysis showed galcanezumab 240 mg ranked first in reducing MMDs (MD -4.40, 95% CrI - 7.60 to - 1.19) and improving 50% response rates (RR: 4.18, 95% CrI: 2.63 to 6.67). Moreover, treatment with fremanezumab or eptinezumab 300 mg provides a significant advantage over erenumab 140 mg regarding an improved response rate of at least 50%. The analysis did not show difference in incidences of TEAEs and serious adverse events in any of the comparisons.
It appears that CGRP mAbs, especially galcanezumab 240 mg, monthly fremanezumab, and eptinezumab 300 mg, seem to be the best choice for the treatment of migraine patients with previous treatment failures. This finding also calls for future research that examine the associations between these medications in migraine therapy among the same patient group to testify the present findings.
针对先前治疗失败的成年偏头痛患者,单克隆抗体抗降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)或其受体的相对疗效仍不确定。因此,本研究系统评估了不同 CGRP 结合单克隆抗体(mAb)对这些患者的比较疗效。
系统检索了 Ovid MEDILNE、Ovid EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov 等多个在线数据库,检索时间从建库至 2022 年 6 月 15 日。纳入了先前治疗失败的成年偏头痛患者的随机临床试验(RCT),评估了任何 CGRP 单克隆抗体。主要疗效结局是每月偏头痛天数(MMD)的变化,主要安全性结局是治疗后出现的不良事件(TEAE)。
共有 7 项研究,总计 3052 例患者纳入分析。三节点分析显示,CGRP mAb 比 CGRP 受体 mAb 更能降低 MMD(MD:-1.55,95%CrI:-2.43 至-0.44)和提高至少 50%的缓解率(RR:1.52,95%CrI:1.04 至 2.21)。九节点分析显示,加奈珠单抗 240mg 在降低 MMD(MD-4.40,95%CrI-7.60 至-1.19)和提高 50%缓解率(RR:4.18,95%CrI:2.63 至 6.67)方面排名第一。此外,与依那西普单抗 300mg 或氟那唑嗪相比,依那西普单抗 140mg 治疗在至少 50%的缓解率方面具有显著优势。在任何比较中,在不良事件和严重不良事件的发生率方面,均未显示出差异。
似乎 CGRP mAb,尤其是加奈珠单抗 240mg、每月氟那唑嗪和依那西普单抗 300mg,可能是治疗先前治疗失败的偏头痛患者的最佳选择。这一发现还呼吁未来的研究,在同一患者群体中检查这些药物在偏头痛治疗中的关联,以验证目前的发现。