Kitano Yutaka, Shinozuka Tsuyoshi
R&D Division, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. 1-2-58 Hiromachi Shinagawa-ku Tokyo 140-8710 Japan
RSC Med Chem. 2022 Aug 1;13(8):895-920. doi: 10.1039/d2md00081d. eCollection 2022 Aug 17.
The selective inhibition of Na1.7 is a promising strategy for developing novel analgesic agents with fewer adverse effects. Although the potent selective inhibition of Na1.7 has been recently achieved, multiple Na1.7 inhibitors failed in clinical development. In this review, the relationship between preclinical efficacy and Na1.7 coverage among three types of voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) inhibitors, namely conventional VGSC inhibitors, sulphonamides and acyl sulphonamides, is discussed. By demonstrating the PK/PD discrepancy of preclinical studies models and clinical results, the potential reasons behind the disconnect between preclinical results and clinical outcomes are discussed together with strategies for developing ideal analgesic agents.
选择性抑制Na1.7是开发不良反应较少的新型镇痛药的一种有前景的策略。尽管最近已实现对Na1.7的强效选择性抑制,但多种Na1.7抑制剂在临床开发中失败。在本综述中,讨论了三种电压门控钠通道(VGSC)抑制剂,即传统VGSC抑制剂、磺酰胺类和酰基磺酰胺类,其临床前疗效与Na1.7覆盖范围之间的关系。通过展示临床前研究模型的药代动力学/药效学差异和临床结果,探讨了临床前结果与临床结局之间脱节背后的潜在原因以及开发理想镇痛药的策略。