Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):e314-e330. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005707. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
To identify the distributions of and extent of variability among 3 new sets of postdischarge quality-metrics measured within 30/90/365 days designed to better account for the unique health needs of older trauma patients: mortality (expansion of the current in-hospital standard), readmission (marker of health-system performance and care coordination), and patients' average number of healthy days at home (marker of patient functional status).
Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of death and loss of independence for the increasing number of older adults living in the United States. Ongoing efforts seek to expand quality evaluation for this population.
Using 100% Medicare claims, we calculated hospital-specific reliability-adjusted postdischarge quality-metrics for older adults aged 65 years or older admitted with a primary diagnosis of trauma, older adults with hip fracture, and older adults with severe traumatic brain injury. Distributions for each quality-metric within each population were assessed and compared with results for in-hospital mortality, the current benchmarking standard.
A total of 785,867 index admissions (305,186 hip fracture and 92,331 severe traumatic brain injury) from 3692 hospitals were included. Within each population, use of postdischarge quality-metrics yielded a broader range of outcomes compared with reliance on in-hospital mortality alone. None of the postdischarge quality-metrics consistently correlated with in-hospital mortality, including death within 1 year [ r =0.581 (95% CI, 0.554-0.608)]. Differences in quintile-rank revealed that when accounting for readmissions (8.4%, κ=0.029) and patients' average number of healthy days at home (7.1%, κ=0.020), as many as 1 in 14 hospitals changed from the best/worst performance under in-hospital mortality to the completely opposite quintile rank.
The use of new postdischarge quality-metrics provides a more complete picture of older adult trauma care: 1 with greater room for improvement and better reflection of multiple aspects of quality important to the health and recovery of older trauma patients when compared with reliance on quality benchmarking based on in-hospital mortality alone.
确定新的三组出院后质量指标在 30/90/365 天内的分布和变异性程度,这些指标旨在更好地满足老年创伤患者的独特健康需求:死亡率(扩大当前住院标准)、再入院(卫生系统绩效和护理协调的标志)以及患者在家中健康天数的平均数量(患者功能状态的标志)。
创伤是导致美国越来越多老年人死亡和丧失独立性的主要原因。正在进行的努力旨在扩大对此人群的质量评估。
我们使用 100%的医疗保险索赔数据,为年龄在 65 岁或以上、因创伤初次诊断住院的老年人、髋部骨折的老年人和严重创伤性脑损伤的老年人计算了医院特定的可靠性调整后的出院后质量指标。评估了每个人群中每个质量指标的分布,并将其与当前的基准衡量标准即院内死亡率进行了比较。
共纳入 785867 例索引入院(305186 例髋部骨折和 92331 例严重创伤性脑损伤),来自 3692 家医院。在每个人群中,与仅依赖院内死亡率相比,使用出院后质量指标产生了更广泛的结果范围。没有任何出院后质量指标与院内死亡率始终相关,包括 1 年内死亡[ r =0.581(95%置信区间,0.554-0.608)]。五分位秩的差异表明,在考虑再入院(8.4%,κ=0.029)和患者在家中健康天数的平均数量(7.1%,κ=0.020)时,多达 14 分之一的医院从根据院内死亡率进行的最佳/最差表现转变为完全相反的五分位秩。
使用新的出院后质量指标可以更全面地了解老年创伤护理:与仅依赖基于院内死亡率的质量基准相比,它有更大的改进空间,并且更好地反映了对老年创伤患者的健康和康复很重要的多个方面的质量。