Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;9(11):860-873. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00227-9. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
Childhood trauma is a common and potent risk factor for developing major depressive disorder in adulthood, associated with earlier onset, more chronic or recurrent symptoms, and greater probability of having comorbidities. Some studies indicate that evidence-based pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies for adult depression might be less efficacious in patients with a history of childhood trauma than patients without childhood trauma, but findings are inconsistent. Therefore, we examined whether individuals with major depressive disorder, including chronic forms of depression, and a reported history of childhood trauma, had more severe depressive symptoms before treatment, had more unfavourable treatment outcomes following active treatments, and were less likely to benefit from active treatments relative to a control condition, compared with individuals with depression without childhood trauma.
We did a comprehensive meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42020220139). Study selection combined the search of bibliographical databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase) from Nov 21, 2013, to March 16, 2020, and full-text randomised clinical trials (RCTs) identified from several sources (1966 up to 2016-19) to identify articles in English. RCTs and open trials comparing the efficacy or effectiveness of evidence-based pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, or combination intervention for adult patients with depressive disorders and the presence or absence of childhood trauma were included. Two independent researchers extracted study characteristics. Group data for effect-size calculations were requested from study authors. The primary outcome was depression severity change from baseline to the end of the acute treatment phase, expressed as standardised effect size (Hedges' g). Meta-analyses were done using random-effects models.
From 10 505 publications, 54 trials met the inclusion criteria, of which 29 (20 RCTs and nine open trials) contributed data of a maximum of 6830 participants (age range 18-85 years, male and female individuals and specific ethnicity data unavailable). More than half (4268 [62%] of 6830) of patients with major depressive disorder reported a history of childhood trauma. Despite having more severe depression at baseline (g=0·202, 95% CI 0·145 to 0·258, I=0%), patients with childhood trauma benefitted from active treatment similarly to patients without childhood trauma history (treatment effect difference between groups g=0·016, -0·094 to 0·125, I=44·3%), with no significant difference in active treatment effects (vs control condition) between individuals with and without childhood trauma (childhood trauma g=0·605, 0·294 to 0·916, I=58·0%; no childhood trauma g=0·178, -0·195 to 0·552, I=67·5%; between-group difference p=0·051), and similar dropout rates (risk ratio 1·063, 0·945 to 1·195, I=0%). Findings did not significantly differ by childhood trauma type, study design, depression diagnosis, assessment method of childhood trauma, study quality, year, or treatment type or length, but differed by country (North American studies showed larger treatment effects for patients with childhood trauma; false discovery rate corrected p=0·0080). Most studies had a moderate to high risk of bias (21 [72%] of 29), but the sensitivity analysis in low-bias studies yielded similar findings to when all studies were included.
Contrary to previous studies, we found evidence that the symptoms of patients with major depressive disorder and childhood trauma significantly improve after pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments, notwithstanding their higher severity of depressive symptoms. Evidence-based psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy should be offered to patients with major depressive disorder regardless of childhood trauma status.
None.
童年创伤是成年后发生重度抑郁症的常见且重要的风险因素,与发病较早、症状更慢性或复发性以及合并症发生概率更高相关。一些研究表明,针对成年抑郁症患者的循证药物治疗和心理治疗,在有童年创伤史的患者中可能不如没有童年创伤史的患者有效,但研究结果并不一致。因此,我们研究了与没有童年创伤的抑郁症患者相比,患有重度抑郁症(包括慢性抑郁症)且有童年创伤史报告的个体在治疗前是否有更严重的抑郁症状,在积极治疗后是否有更不利的治疗结果,以及从积极治疗中获益的可能性是否更低。
我们进行了一项全面的荟萃分析(PROSPERO CRD42020220139)。研究选择结合了对2013年11月21日至2020年3月16日书目数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO和Embase)的检索,以及从多个来源(1966年至2016 - 19年)识别出的全文随机临床试验(RCT),以识别英文文章。纳入了比较循证药物治疗、心理治疗或联合干预对成年抑郁症患者疗效或有效性以及有无童年创伤的随机对照试验和开放试验。两名独立研究人员提取了研究特征。向研究作者索取用于效应量计算的组数据。主要结局是从基线到急性治疗阶段结束时抑郁严重程度的变化,以标准化效应量(Hedges' g)表示。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
从10505篇出版物中,54项试验符合纳入标准,其中29项(20项随机对照试验和9项开放试验)提供了数据,最多涉及6830名参与者(年龄范围18 - 85岁,男性和女性个体,具体种族数据不可用)。超过一半(6830名中的4268名[62%])的重度抑郁症患者报告有童年创伤史。尽管童年创伤患者在基线时抑郁更严重(g = 0.202,95%CI 0.145至0.258,I = 0%),但有童年创伤史的患者与没有童年创伤史的患者从积极治疗中获益相似(两组间治疗效应差异g = 0.016,-0.094至0.125,I = 44.3%),有童年创伤和没有童年创伤个体在积极治疗效果(与对照条件相比)上无显著差异(童年创伤g = 0.605,0.294至0.916,I = 58.0%;无童年创伤g = 0.178,-0.195至0.552,I = 67.5%;组间差异p = 0.051),且退出率相似(风险比1.063,0.945至1.195,I = 0%)。研究结果在童年创伤类型、研究设计、抑郁症诊断、童年创伤评估方法、研究质量、年份、治疗类型或时长方面无显著差异,但在国家方面存在差异(北美研究显示童年创伤患者的治疗效果更大;错误发现率校正p = 0.0080)。大多数研究存在中度至高偏倚风险(29项中的21项[72%]),但低偏倚研究的敏感性分析得出的结果与纳入所有研究时相似。
与先前研究相反,我们发现有证据表明,尽管患有重度抑郁症且有童年创伤的患者抑郁症状更严重,但在药物治疗和心理治疗后症状显著改善。无论童年创伤状况如何,都应向重度抑郁症患者提供循证心理治疗和药物治疗。
无。