Ullah Asad, Jawaid Syed I, Qureshi Pir Naveed Ahmed Ahsan, Siddiqui Tehreem, Nasim Khadija, Kumar Kantash, Ullah Shafqat, Sajjad Cheema Mustafa, Kumari Nikita, Elias Hafiza Azad
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Medical Teaching Institution (MTI) Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.
Department of Medicine, Liaquat College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, PAK.
Cureus. 2022 Aug 23;14(8):e28292. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28292. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Objectives Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has become quite a popular course of treatment and has tremendous healing properties. Our research question inquired about the effectiveness of injected formula of PRP as the cure for diabetic foot ulcer in comparison to the conventional dressing. Methodology A prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan, between July 2020 to January 2021. Patients' data were collected from the department's database after taking approval from the department. In our study, the selected patients were categorized into two equal groups - i.e. 80 cases in each group and were randomized by using randomization allocation software. In group I (study group) patients received PRP (1 ml /1 cm) around the wound edges and in the base of the ulcer, while group II (control group) patients were treated with conventional dressing. Each patient was inspected for wounds on days 0, 14, 28, 90, and 180 on the basis of Wagner's classification of wounds to assess efficacy. A proforma was used to collect the required data and then utilized electronically for research analysis. Results The mean ± SD of age was 54.4±8.56 and 57.7±10.1 years in the injected PRP (study) and conventional dressing (control) groups, respectively. Of the 30 patients, 13 (43.3%) males and 17 (56.7%) females were enrolled in the study group, while 14 (46.7%) males and 16 (53.3%) females were included in the control group. The PRP was found effective in reducing the wound in about 64 (80%) patients, while wound dressing was effective in 37 (46.25%) patients (p<0.0001). In female patients, the wound healing was significantly better in the study group as compared to the control group (p<0.0001). Moreover, in patients aged above 55 years, frequently higher rates of wound reduction were observed in the study group as compared to the control group (p<0.0001). Conclusion The study concluded that injected PRP was significantly better than conventional dressing in the management of diabetic foot ulcer. More clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of injected PRP to validate the current findings.
目的 富血小板血浆(PRP)已成为一种颇受欢迎的治疗方法,具有巨大的愈合特性。我们的研究问题是探究与传统敷料相比,注射用PRP配方治疗糖尿病足溃疡的有效性。方法 在巴基斯坦白沙瓦市雷丁夫人医院糖尿病与内分泌科于2020年7月至2021年1月期间进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。经科室批准后,从科室数据库收集患者数据。在我们的研究中,将选定的患者分为两个相等的组,即每组80例,并使用随机分配软件进行随机分组。在第一组(研究组)中,患者在伤口边缘和溃疡底部接受PRP(1毫升/1厘米)注射,而第二组(对照组)患者接受传统敷料治疗。根据瓦格纳伤口分类法,在第0、14、28、90和180天对每位患者的伤口进行检查以评估疗效。使用一份表格收集所需数据,然后以电子方式用于研究分析。结果 注射PRP(研究)组和传统敷料(对照)组的平均年龄±标准差分别为54.4±8.56岁和57.7±10.1岁。在30例患者中,研究组有13例(43.3%)男性和17例(56.7%)女性,而对照组有14例(46.7%)男性和16例(53.3%)女性。发现PRP对约64例(80%)患者的伤口缩小有效,而伤口敷料对37例(46.25%)患者有效(p<0.0001)。在女性患者中,研究组的伤口愈合明显优于对照组(p<0.0001)。此外,在55岁以上的患者中,研究组的伤口缩小率通常高于对照组(p<0.0001)。结论 该研究得出结论,在糖尿病足溃疡的治疗中,注射PRP明显优于传统敷料。需要更多的临床试验来评估注射PRP的有效性,以验证当前的研究结果。