Nanyunja Carol, Sadoo Samantha, Kohli-Lynch Maya, Nalugya Ruth, Nyonyintono James, Muhumuza Anita, Katumba Kenneth R, Trautner Emily, Magnusson Brooke, Kabugo Daniel, Cowan Frances M, Zuurmond Maria, Morgan Catherine, Lester Deborah, Seeley Janet, Webb Emily L, Otai Christine, Greco Giulia, Nampijja Margaret, Tann Cally J
MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 13;10:981976. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.981976. eCollection 2022.
Early care and support provision for young children with developmental disabilities is frequently lacking, yet has potential to improve child and family outcomes, and is crucial for promoting access to healthcare and early education. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, early evidence of impact and provider costs of the Baby Ubuntu participatory, peer-facilitated, group program for young children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers in Uganda.
A feasibility trial, with two parallel groups, compared Baby Ubuntu with standard care. Caregivers and children, aged 6-11 months with moderate-severe neurodevelopmental impairment, were recruited and followed for 12 months. Quantitative and qualitative methods captured information on feasibility (ability to recruit), acceptability (satisfactory attendance), preliminary evidence of impact (family quality of life) and provider costs.
One hundred twenty-six infants (median developmental quotient, 28.7) were recruited and randomized (63 per arm) over 9 months, demonstrating feasibility; 101 (80%) completed the 12-month follow-up assessment (9 died, 12 were lost to follow up, 4 withdrew). Of 63 randomized to the intervention, 59 survived (93%); of these, 51 (86%) attended ≥6 modules meeting acceptability criteria, and 49 (83%) completed the 12 month follow-up assessment. Qualitatively, Baby Ubuntu was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and facilitators. Enabling factors included community sensitization by local champions, positive and caring attitudes of facilitators toward children with disability, peer support, and the participatory approach to learning. Among 101 (86%) surviving children seen at 12 months, mixed methods evaluation provided qualitative evidence of impact on family knowledge, skills, and attitudes, however impact on a scored family quality of life tool was inconclusive. Barriers included stigma and exclusion, poverty, and the need to manage expectations around the child's progress. Total provider cost for delivering the program per participant was USD 232.
A pilot feasibility trial of the Baby Ubuntu program found it to be feasible and acceptable to children, caregivers and healthcare workers in Uganda. A mixed methods evaluation provided rich programmatic learning including qualitative, but not quantitative, evidence of impact. The cost estimate represents a feasible intervention for this vulnerable group, encouraging financial sustainability at scale.
[https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44380971], identifier [ISRCTN44380971].
针对发育障碍幼儿的早期护理和支持服务常常不足,然而其有改善儿童及其家庭状况的潜力,对于促进获得医疗保健和早期教育至关重要。我们评估了乌干达针对发育障碍幼儿及其照料者的“宝贝乌班图”参与式、同伴促进小组项目的可行性、可接受性、早期影响证据及提供者成本。
一项可行性试验,设两个平行组,将“宝贝乌班图”与标准护理进行比较。招募了6至11个月大、患有中度至重度神经发育障碍的照料者和儿童,并随访12个月。定量和定性方法收集了关于可行性(招募能力)、可接受性(令人满意的出勤率)、影响的初步证据(家庭生活质量)和提供者成本的信息。
在9个月内招募并随机分配了126名婴儿(发育商中位数为28.7)(每组63名),证明了可行性;101名(80%)完成了12个月的随访评估(9名死亡,12名失访,4名退出)。在随机分配到干预组的63名中,59名存活(93%);其中,51名(86%)参加了≥6个符合可接受性标准的模块,49名(83%)完成了12个月的随访评估。定性地说,“宝贝乌班图”对照料者和促进者来说是可行且可接受的。促成因素包括当地倡导者进行的社区宣传、促进者对残疾儿童的积极关爱态度、同伴支持以及参与式学习方法。在12个月时见到的101名存活儿童(86%)中,混合方法评估提供了对家庭知识、技能和态度有影响的定性证据,然而对计分的家庭生活质量工具的影响尚无定论。障碍包括耻辱和排斥、贫困以及需要管理对孩子进步的期望。每位参与者实施该项目的总提供者成本为232美元。
“宝贝乌班图”项目的一项试点可行性试验发现,它对乌干达的儿童、照料者和医护人员来说是可行且可接受的。混合方法评估提供了丰富的项目经验,包括影响的定性但非定量证据。成本估计代表了对这一弱势群体的可行干预措施,鼓励大规模的财务可持续性。
[https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44380971],标识符[ISRCTN44380971]。