Suppr超能文献

固体燃料使用与中老年人群痴呆症风险评分的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Association of solid fuel use with a risk score capturing dementia risk among middle-aged and older adults: A prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Pu Fan, Hu Yingying, Li Chenxi, Cao Xingqi, Yang Zhenqing, Liu Yi, Zhang Jingyun, Li Xueqin, Yang Yongli, Wang Wei, Liu Xiaoting, Hu Kejia, Ma Yanan, Liu Zuyun

机构信息

Department of Big Data in Health Science School of Public Health and Center for Clinical Big Data and Analytics of the Second Affiliated Hospital, The Key Laboratory of Intelligent Preventive Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.

School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2023 Feb 1;218:115022. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.115022. Epub 2022 Dec 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Whether household air pollution is associated with dementia risk remains unknown. This study examined the associations between solid fuel use for cooking and heating (the main source of household air pollution) and dementia risk.

METHODS

This analysis included data on 11,352 participants (aged 45+ years) from the 2011 wave of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, with follow-up to 2018. Dementia risk was assessed by a risk score using the Rotterdam Study Basic Dementia Risk Model (BDRM), which was subsequently standardized for analysis. Household fuel types of cooking and heating were categorized as solid (e.g., coal and crop residue) and clean (e.g., central heating and solar). Multivariable analyses were performed using generalized estimating equations. Moreover, we examined the joint associations of solid fuel use for cooking and heating with the BDRM score.

RESULTS

After adjusting for potential confounders, we found an independent and significant association of solid (vs. clean) fuel use for cooking and heating with a higher BDRM score (e.g., β = 0.17 for solid fuel for cooking; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.19). Participants who used solid (vs. clean) fuel for both cooking and heating had the highest BDRM score (β = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.29-0.36). Subgroup analysis suggested stronger associations in participants living in rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Solid fuel use for cooking and heating was independently associated with increased dementia risk in Chinese middle-aged and older adults, particularly among those living in rural areas. Our findings call for more efforts to facilitate universal access to clean energy for dementia prevention.

摘要

目的

家庭空气污染是否与痴呆风险相关尚不清楚。本研究调查了用于烹饪和取暖的固体燃料使用情况(家庭空气污染的主要来源)与痴呆风险之间的关联。

方法

该分析纳入了来自2011年中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)的11352名年龄在45岁及以上的参与者的数据,并随访至2018年。使用鹿特丹研究基本痴呆风险模型(BDRM)通过风险评分评估痴呆风险,随后对其进行标准化分析。烹饪和取暖的家庭燃料类型分为固体燃料(如煤炭和农作物秸秆)和清洁能源(如集中供暖和太阳能)。使用广义估计方程进行多变量分析。此外,我们研究了烹饪和取暖使用固体燃料与BDRM评分的联合关联。

结果

在调整潜在混杂因素后,我们发现烹饪和取暖使用固体燃料(相对于清洁能源)与更高的BDRM评分存在独立且显著的关联(例如,烹饪使用固体燃料时β = 0.17;95%置信区间[CI]:0.15 - 0.19)。烹饪和取暖都使用固体燃料(相对于清洁能源)的参与者BDRM评分最高(β = 0.32;95% CI:0.29 - 0.36)。亚组分析表明,农村地区参与者的关联更强。

结论

烹饪和取暖使用固体燃料与中国中老年人群痴呆风险增加独立相关,尤其是农村地区人群。我们的研究结果呼吁做出更多努力,以促进普及清洁能源来预防痴呆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验