Hes Ondřej, Michalová Květoslava, Pivovarčíková Kristýna
Cesk Patol. 2022 Fall;67(4):187-191.
The 5th edition of WHO classification of adult renal tumors introduced a couple of changes in existing, well established entities, as well as some new distinct renal tumors. Papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is no longer divided into type 1 and type 2. Type 1 is now called “classic” variant and type 2 doesn´t exist anymore. There were long discussion about problematic type 2. According to WHO 2022 the correct name is papillary RCC (and subtype/variant should be mentioned in the description). Another important change came for clear cell papillary RCC. Because there is no convincing evidence that genuine clear cell papillary RCC can produce recurrences or metastases, it is now termed as clear cell papillary tumor. All previously reported aggressive cases are now considered misclassified clear cell RCC (mostly) or other entities. In less typical cases, genetic support of diagnosis with complex analysis of VHL gene should be added. New category “other oncocytic tumors” emerged for tumors from gray zone between renal oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC. Term hybrid oncocytic tumor should be reserved for those with hereditary Birth-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Emerging entities, like eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) and oncocytic low-grade tumor (LOT) are mentioned, however, more work is needed for better establishment of the criteria. There is a new category of “molecularly defined renal carcinomas”, where MITf translocation RCCs are divided into TFE3 rearranged RCC with fusion partner dependent morphologic variability, and to TFEB rearranged RCC. In this group, indolent TFEB translocated RCCs are recognized, as well as potentionally aggressive RCC with TFEB gene amplification. In WHO 2016, ALK rearranged RCC was considered as emerging entity. In WHO 2022 it is listed among “molecularly defined RCC” as a distinct renal tumor with broad morphologic spectrum dependent partly on fusion partners. ELOC (TCEB1) mutated RCC is renal tumor composed of clear cell elements and huge fibromyomatous stroma. Diagnostic approach should be complex with support of immunohistochemistry (including CK7) and molecular genetic approach. However, there is overlap with MTOR pathway genes mutated RCC with fibromyomatous stroma. SMARCB1 deficient renal medullary carcinoma is high-grade invasive adenocarcinoma in patients with clinically proved sickle-cell trait and SMARCB1 deficiency.
世界卫生组织(WHO)成人肾肿瘤分类第5版对一些已确立的现有实体进行了多项更改,并新增了一些不同的肾肿瘤。乳头状肾细胞癌(RCC)不再分为1型和2型。1型现在称为“经典”变体,2型已不再存在。关于有问题的2型曾有过长期讨论。根据WHO 2022版,正确名称为乳头状RCC(描述中应提及亚型/变体)。透明细胞乳头状RCC也有一项重要更改。由于没有令人信服的证据表明真正的透明细胞乳头状RCC会发生复发或转移,现在它被称为透明细胞乳头状肿瘤。所有先前报道的侵袭性病例现在大多被认为是分类错误的透明细胞RCC或其他实体。在不太典型的病例中,应增加对VHL基因进行复杂分析的基因诊断支持。肾嗜酸细胞瘤和嫌色性RCC之间灰色地带的肿瘤出现了新的类别“其他嗜酸细胞瘤性肿瘤”。术语混合嗜酸细胞瘤性肿瘤应保留用于患有遗传性Birth-Hogg-Dubé综合征的患者。文中提到了一些新出现的实体,如嗜酸性空泡状肿瘤(EVT)和嗜酸细胞瘤性低级别肿瘤(LOT),然而,需要更多工作来更好地确立诊断标准。有一个新的“分子定义的肾癌”类别,其中MITf易位性RCC分为具有融合伴侣依赖性形态学变异的TFE3重排RCC和TFEB重排RCC。在这一组中,认识到了惰性的TFEB易位性RCC以及具有TFEB基因扩增的潜在侵袭性RCC。在WHO 2016版中,ALK重排RCC被视为新出现的实体。在WHO 2022版中,它被列为“分子定义的RCC”中的一种独特肾肿瘤,其形态学谱广泛,部分取决于融合伴侣。ELOC(TCEB1)突变的RCC是一种由透明细胞成分和巨大纤维肌瘤样间质组成的肾肿瘤。诊断方法应综合免疫组织化学(包括CK7)和分子遗传学方法的支持。然而,它与具有纤维肌瘤样间质的MTOR通路基因突变的RCC存在重叠。SMARCB1缺陷型肾髓质癌是临床已证实具有镰状细胞性状且存在SMARCB1缺陷的患者中的高级别浸润性腺癌。