Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Tob Control. 2024 Nov 10;33(e2):e246-e253. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057670.
Reducing racial and socioeconomic inequities in smoking has been declared a priority for tobacco control in the USA for several decades. Yet despite the rhetoric, these inequities persist and some have actually worsened over time. Although tobacco companies have targeted racially and ethnically diverse and lower-income tobacco users, which substantially contributes to these disparities, less attention has been given to the role of individuals and organisations within the tobacco control movement who have allowed progress in eliminating disparities to stagnate. We examine the failure of tobacco control professionals to ensure the widespread adoption of equity-focused tobacco control strategies. Review of major US tobacco control reports found that the focus on equity often stops after describing inequities in tobacco use. We suggest ways to advance equity in tobacco control in the USA. These recommendations fall across five categories: surveillance, interventions, funding, accountability and addressing root causes. Policy interventions that will have a pro-equity impact on smoking and related disease should be prioritised. Funding should be designated to tobacco control activities focused on eliminating racial and socioeconomic inequities in smoking, and tobacco control programmes should be held accountable for meeting equity-related goals.
减少美国吸烟的种族和社会经济不平等问题几十年来一直被宣布为烟草控制的优先事项。然而,尽管言辞如此,这些不平等现象仍然存在,而且有些甚至随着时间的推移而恶化。尽管烟草公司一直针对种族和族裔多样化以及收入较低的烟草使用者,这在很大程度上导致了这些差异,但人们对烟草控制运动中的个人和组织在允许消除差异方面的进展停滞不前的作用关注较少。我们研究了烟草控制专业人员未能确保广泛采用注重公平的烟草控制战略的问题。对美国主要烟草控制报告的审查发现,对公平的关注往往在描述烟草使用方面的不平等之后就停止了。我们提出了在美国推进烟草控制公平的方法。这些建议涵盖五个方面:监测、干预、资金、问责制和解决根本原因。应优先考虑对吸烟和相关疾病具有公平影响的政策干预措施。应指定资金用于以消除吸烟方面的种族和社会经济不平等为重点的烟草控制活动,并且应要求烟草控制方案实现与公平相关的目标。