Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
JAMA. 2022 Dec 27;328(24):2404-2411. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.22790.
Labor unionization efforts have resurged in the US, and union membership has been shown to improve worker conditions in some industries. However, little is known about labor unionization membership and its economic effects across the health care workforce.
To examine the prevalence of labor unionization among health care workers and its associations with pay, noncash benefits, and work hours.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Current Population Survey and Annual Social and Economic Supplement from 2009 through 2021. The US nationally representative, population-based household survey allowed for a sample of 14 298 self-identified health care workers (physicians and dentists, advanced practitioners, nurses, therapists, and technicians and support staff).
Self-reported membership status or coverage in a labor union.
Prevalence and trend in labor unionization. Further comparisons included mean weekly pay, noncash benefits (pension or other retirement benefits; employer-sponsored, full premium-covered health insurance; and employer's contribution to the worker's health insurance plan), and work hours.
The 14 298 respondents (81.5% women; 7.1% Asian, 12.0% Black, 8.5% Hispanic, 70.4% White individuals; mean [SD] age, 41.6 [13.4] years) included 1072 physicians and dentists, 981 advanced practitioners, 4931 nurses, 964 therapists, and 6350 technicians and support staff. After weighting, 13.2% (95% CI, 12.5% to 13.8%) of respondents reported union membership or coverage, with no significant trend from 2009 through 2021 (P = .75). Among health care workers, those who were members of a racial or ethnic minority group (Asian, Black, or Hispanic individuals compared with White individuals) and those living in metropolitan areas were more likely to report being labor unionized. Reported unionization was associated with significantly higher reported weekly earnings ($1165 vs $1042; mean difference, $123 [95% CI, $88 to $157]; P < .001) and higher likelihood of having a pension or other retirement benefits at work (57.9% vs 43.4%; risk ratio [RR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.26 to 1.41]; P < .001) and having employer-sponsored, full premium-covered health insurance (22.2% vs 16.5%; RR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.53]; P < .001). Union members reported more work hours (37.4 vs 36.3; mean differences, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.46 to 1.75]; P < .001) per week. White workers reported mean weekly earnings that were significantly more than members of racial and ethnic minority groups among nonunionized workers ($1066 vs $1001; mean difference, $65 [95% CI, $40 to $91]; P < .001), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups among unionized workers ($1157 vs $1170; mean difference, -$13 [95% CI, -$78 to $52]; P = .70).
From 2009 through 2021, labor unionization among US health care workers remained low. Reported union membership or coverage was significantly associated with higher weekly earnings and better noncash benefits but greater number of weekly work hours.
美国的工会化努力再次兴起,工会成员的增加已经显示出在某些行业改善工人条件的效果。然而,关于医疗保健劳动力中的工会化成员及其经济影响,人们知之甚少。
调查医疗保健工作者的工会化比例及其与薪酬、非现金福利和工作时间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究使用了 2009 年至 2021 年期间来自当前人口调查和年度社会经济补充调查的数据。这项美国全国代表性的、基于人口的家庭调查允许抽取 14298 名自报身份为医疗保健工作者的样本(医生和牙医、高级从业者、护士、治疗师、技师和支持人员)。
自我报告的工会成员身份或工会覆盖范围。
工会化的流行率和趋势。进一步的比较包括平均每周薪酬、非现金福利(养老金或其他退休福利;雇主全额支付保费的医疗保险;以及雇主对工人健康保险计划的贡献)和工作时间。
14298 名受访者(81.5%为女性;7.1%为亚洲人,12.0%为黑人,8.5%为西班牙裔,70.4%为白人;平均[标准差]年龄为 41.6[13.4]岁)包括 1072 名医生和牙医、981 名高级从业者、4931 名护士、964 名治疗师和 6350 名技师和支持人员。经过加权处理,13.2%(95%置信区间,12.5%至 13.8%)的受访者报告了工会成员身份或工会覆盖范围,从 2009 年到 2021 年没有明显的趋势(P = .75)。在医疗保健工作者中,属于种族或族裔少数群体(亚洲人、黑人或西班牙裔人与白人相比)和居住在大都市区的人更有可能报告工会化。报告的工会化与报告的每周收入显著更高相关($1165 比 $1042;平均差异,$123 [95%置信区间,$88 至 $157];P < .001),并且更有可能在工作中拥有养老金或其他退休福利(57.9%比 43.4%;风险比[RR],1.33 [95%置信区间,1.26 至 1.41];P < .001)和雇主全额支付保费的医疗保险(22.2%比 16.5%;RR,1.35 [95%置信区间,1.17 至 1.53];P < .001)。工会成员报告的工作时间更长(37.4 比 36.3;平均差异,1.11 [95%置信区间,0.46 至 1.75];P < .001)。非工会化的白人工人报告的每周平均薪酬明显高于种族和族裔少数群体的成员($1066 比 $1001;平均差异,$65 [95%置信区间,$40 至 $91];P < .001),但在工会化工人中,这两个群体之间没有显著差异($1157 比 $1170;平均差异,-$13 [95%置信区间,-$78 至 $52];P = .70)。
从 2009 年到 2021 年,美国医疗保健工作者的工会化比例仍然很低。报告的工会成员身份或工会覆盖范围与更高的每周收入和更好的非现金福利显著相关,但工作时间更长。