Suppr超能文献

美国医护人员工会化趋势,2009-2021 年。

Trends in Labor Unionization Among US Health Care Workers, 2009-2021.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Dec 27;328(24):2404-2411. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.22790.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Labor unionization efforts have resurged in the US, and union membership has been shown to improve worker conditions in some industries. However, little is known about labor unionization membership and its economic effects across the health care workforce.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prevalence of labor unionization among health care workers and its associations with pay, noncash benefits, and work hours.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Current Population Survey and Annual Social and Economic Supplement from 2009 through 2021. The US nationally representative, population-based household survey allowed for a sample of 14 298 self-identified health care workers (physicians and dentists, advanced practitioners, nurses, therapists, and technicians and support staff).

EXPOSURES

Self-reported membership status or coverage in a labor union.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Prevalence and trend in labor unionization. Further comparisons included mean weekly pay, noncash benefits (pension or other retirement benefits; employer-sponsored, full premium-covered health insurance; and employer's contribution to the worker's health insurance plan), and work hours.

RESULTS

The 14 298 respondents (81.5% women; 7.1% Asian, 12.0% Black, 8.5% Hispanic, 70.4% White individuals; mean [SD] age, 41.6 [13.4] years) included 1072 physicians and dentists, 981 advanced practitioners, 4931 nurses, 964 therapists, and 6350 technicians and support staff. After weighting, 13.2% (95% CI, 12.5% to 13.8%) of respondents reported union membership or coverage, with no significant trend from 2009 through 2021 (P = .75). Among health care workers, those who were members of a racial or ethnic minority group (Asian, Black, or Hispanic individuals compared with White individuals) and those living in metropolitan areas were more likely to report being labor unionized. Reported unionization was associated with significantly higher reported weekly earnings ($1165 vs $1042; mean difference, $123 [95% CI, $88 to $157]; P < .001) and higher likelihood of having a pension or other retirement benefits at work (57.9% vs 43.4%; risk ratio [RR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.26 to 1.41]; P < .001) and having employer-sponsored, full premium-covered health insurance (22.2% vs 16.5%; RR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.53]; P < .001). Union members reported more work hours (37.4 vs 36.3; mean differences, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.46 to 1.75]; P < .001) per week. White workers reported mean weekly earnings that were significantly more than members of racial and ethnic minority groups among nonunionized workers ($1066 vs $1001; mean difference, $65 [95% CI, $40 to $91]; P < .001), but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups among unionized workers ($1157 vs $1170; mean difference, -$13 [95% CI, -$78 to $52]; P = .70).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

From 2009 through 2021, labor unionization among US health care workers remained low. Reported union membership or coverage was significantly associated with higher weekly earnings and better noncash benefits but greater number of weekly work hours.

摘要

重要性

美国的工会化努力再次兴起,工会成员的增加已经显示出在某些行业改善工人条件的效果。然而,关于医疗保健劳动力中的工会化成员及其经济影响,人们知之甚少。

目的

调查医疗保健工作者的工会化比例及其与薪酬、非现金福利和工作时间的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:本横断面研究使用了 2009 年至 2021 年期间来自当前人口调查和年度社会经济补充调查的数据。这项美国全国代表性的、基于人口的家庭调查允许抽取 14298 名自报身份为医疗保健工作者的样本(医生和牙医、高级从业者、护士、治疗师、技师和支持人员)。

暴露因素

自我报告的工会成员身份或工会覆盖范围。

主要结果和措施

工会化的流行率和趋势。进一步的比较包括平均每周薪酬、非现金福利(养老金或其他退休福利;雇主全额支付保费的医疗保险;以及雇主对工人健康保险计划的贡献)和工作时间。

结果

14298 名受访者(81.5%为女性;7.1%为亚洲人,12.0%为黑人,8.5%为西班牙裔,70.4%为白人;平均[标准差]年龄为 41.6[13.4]岁)包括 1072 名医生和牙医、981 名高级从业者、4931 名护士、964 名治疗师和 6350 名技师和支持人员。经过加权处理,13.2%(95%置信区间,12.5%至 13.8%)的受访者报告了工会成员身份或工会覆盖范围,从 2009 年到 2021 年没有明显的趋势(P = .75)。在医疗保健工作者中,属于种族或族裔少数群体(亚洲人、黑人或西班牙裔人与白人相比)和居住在大都市区的人更有可能报告工会化。报告的工会化与报告的每周收入显著更高相关($1165 比 $1042;平均差异,$123 [95%置信区间,$88 至 $157];P < .001),并且更有可能在工作中拥有养老金或其他退休福利(57.9%比 43.4%;风险比[RR],1.33 [95%置信区间,1.26 至 1.41];P < .001)和雇主全额支付保费的医疗保险(22.2%比 16.5%;RR,1.35 [95%置信区间,1.17 至 1.53];P < .001)。工会成员报告的工作时间更长(37.4 比 36.3;平均差异,1.11 [95%置信区间,0.46 至 1.75];P < .001)。非工会化的白人工人报告的每周平均薪酬明显高于种族和族裔少数群体的成员($1066 比 $1001;平均差异,$65 [95%置信区间,$40 至 $91];P < .001),但在工会化工人中,这两个群体之间没有显著差异($1157 比 $1170;平均差异,-$13 [95%置信区间,-$78 至 $52];P = .70)。

结论和相关性

从 2009 年到 2021 年,美国医疗保健工作者的工会化比例仍然很低。报告的工会成员身份或工会覆盖范围与更高的每周收入和更好的非现金福利显著相关,但工作时间更长。

相似文献

1
Trends in Labor Unionization Among US Health Care Workers, 2009-2021.
JAMA. 2022 Dec 27;328(24):2404-2411. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.22790.
4
Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Premium Cost Growth and Its Association With Earnings Inequality Among US Families.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2351644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.51644.
5
Estimation and Comparison of Current and Future Racial/Ethnic Representation in the US Health Care Workforce.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e213789. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3789.
6
Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Unionization in Direct Care Occupations.
Am J Public Health. 2022 Nov;112(11):1676-1684. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307022.
8
National Evaluation of the Association Between Resident Labor Union Participation and Surgical Resident Well-being.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123412. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23412.
9
Earnings of Employed and Self-employed US Health Care Professionals, 2001 to 2015.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180431. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0431.
10
Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Differences in Food Allergies in the US.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2318162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18162.

引用本文的文献

2
Resident Physician Intentions Regarding Unionization.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253106. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3106.
3
Affording Childcare on a Surgical Resident's Salary.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250708. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0708.
4
Do we need to 'unionize' in healthcare?
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;41(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01874-8. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
5
The Impact of Unions on US Direct Care Workers in Long-Term Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Dec;25(12):105236. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105236. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
6
Changes in Health Care Workers' Economic Outcomes Following Medicaid Expansion.
JAMA. 2024 Feb 27;331(8):687-695. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27014.
7
Labor Unions and Staff Turnover in US Nursing Homes.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337898. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37898.

本文引用的文献

1
The Rise and Potential of Physician Unions.
JAMA. 2022 Aug 16;328(7):617-618. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12835.
3
Resident Mortality And Worker Infection Rates From COVID-19 Lower In Union Than Nonunion US Nursing Homes, 2020-21.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 May;41(5):751-759. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01687. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
4
Examining Wage Disparities by Race and Ethnicity of Health Care Workers.
Med Care. 2021 Oct 1;59(Suppl 5):S471-S478. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001613.
6
National Evaluation of the Association Between Resident Labor Union Participation and Surgical Resident Well-being.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123412. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23412.
7
The Role of Labor Unions in Creating Working Conditions That Promote Public Health.
Am J Public Health. 2016 Jun;106(6):989-95. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303138. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验