School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Dec;25(12):105236. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105236. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
To meet a growing demand for direct care workers (DCWs) in the United States, structural, organizational, and policy-related solutions are needed. Unionization of the workforce may be one such mechanism; however, its impact on outcomes remains poorly understood. To examine the impact of unionization on DCWs' financial well-being and employment attitudes, as well as patient outcomes.
A systematic search of AgeLine, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception through June 20, 2024. We included peer-reviewed empirical studies that used observational, quasi-experimental, and experimental designs.
Studies pertained to DCWs who provided care in the home and long-term care settings. We focused on studies that illustrated the financial outcomes of DCWs (wages, compensation, benefits), employment outcomes (job satisfaction, turnover), and health-related outcomes of DCWs and their patients.
Covidence was used to screen studies for inclusion criteria. Study characteristics were abstracted manually by prespecified domains. The Downs and Black tool was used for quality assessment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed.
A total of 19 studies met inclusion criteria; they were predominantly observational (94%), with local (47%) and national (53%) samples. Three studies focused on compensation and all found that unionization was associated with higher wages and benefits among DCWs. Seven studies focused on employment, finding that unionization was associated with greater job satisfaction, quality, and retention, particularly among nursing home staff and home health aides. Unionized workplaces reported better care quality and safety, including fewer injuries and better equipment provision. Unionization's impact on patient outcomes showed mixed results, particularly among nursing home residents. Overall, the quality of the research studies varied, with limitations in methodology and sampling affecting reliability.
Unionization among DCWs was generally associated with higher wages, benefits, and job satisfaction, as well as reduced turnover; however, its impact on worker and patient outcomes varied across studies. The overall quality of the studies was fair to poor, highlighting the need for more rigorous research in this area.
为满足美国对直接护理人员(DCW)不断增长的需求,需要寻找结构性、组织性和政策相关的解决方案。员工工会化可能是一种这样的机制;然而,其对结果的影响仍知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨工会化对 DCW 的经济福祉和就业态度以及患者结局的影响。
系统检索了 AgeLine、CINAHL、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库,检索时间从建库起至 2024 年 6 月 20 日。纳入了使用观察性、准实验性和实验性设计的同行评议的实证研究。
研究对象为在家庭和长期护理环境中提供护理的 DCW。我们重点关注说明了 DCW 的经济结果(工资、薪酬、福利)、就业结果(工作满意度、离职率)以及 DCW 和其患者的健康相关结局的研究。
Covidence 用于筛选符合纳入标准的研究。使用预定义的领域手动提取研究特征。采用 Downs 和 Black 工具进行质量评估。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的 Preferred Reporting Items(PRISMA)指南。
共有 19 项研究符合纳入标准;它们主要是观察性研究(94%),样本来自地方(47%)和全国(53%)。三项研究专注于薪酬,均发现工会化与 DCW 的更高工资和福利相关。七项研究关注就业,发现工会化与更大的工作满意度、更高的质量和保留率相关,特别是在疗养院和家庭保健助手员工中。工会化的工作场所报告了更好的护理质量和安全性,包括更少的伤害和更好的设备供应。工会化对患者结局的影响结果不一,特别是在疗养院居民中。总体而言,研究的研究质量参差不齐,方法和抽样的局限性影响了可靠性。
一般来说,DCW 的工会化与更高的工资、福利和工作满意度以及更低的离职率相关;然而,其对工人和患者结局的影响在研究之间存在差异。研究的总体质量为一般到较差,突出了该领域更严格研究的必要性。