KLGHEI of Environment and Energy Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
KLGHEI of Environment and Energy Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.
Chemosphere. 2023 Feb;315:137653. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137653. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
The global elimination and restriction of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), respectively, have urged manufacturers to shift production to their substitutes which still pose threat to the environment with their bioaccumulation, toxicity and migration issues. In this context, efficient technologies and systematic mechanistic studies on the degradation of PFOA/PFOS substitutes are highly desirable. In this review, we summarize the progress in degrading PFOA/PFOS substitutes, including four kinds of mainstream methods. The pros and cons of the present technologies are analyzed, which renders the discussion of future prospects on rational optimizations. Additional discussion is made on the differences in the degradation of various kinds of substitutes, which is compared to the PFOA/PFOS and derives designing principles for more degradable F-containing compounds.
全氟辛酸(PFOA)和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)的全球淘汰和限制分别促使制造商将生产转移到其替代品上,而这些替代品仍存在生物蓄积、毒性和迁移问题,对环境构成威胁。在这种情况下,非常需要开发高效的技术和对 PFOA/PFOS 替代品的降解进行系统的机理研究。在这篇综述中,我们总结了降解 PFOA/PFOS 替代品的研究进展,包括四种主流方法。分析了现有技术的优缺点,为合理优化技术提供了讨论的基础。此外,还讨论了各种替代品降解的差异,与 PFOA/PFOS 进行了比较,并得出了更易降解的含氟化合物的设计原则。