Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Center for Augmented Intelligence, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 30;12(12):e058191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058191.
Differences in National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding between specialties may affect research and patient outcomes in specialties that are less well funded.The aim of this study is to evaluate how NIH funding has been awarded by medical specialty. This study assesses differences and trends in the amount of funding, by medical specialty, for the years 2011-2020, via a retrospective analysis of data from the NIH RePORTER (Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results).
Longitudinal cross-sectional study SETTING: NIH RePORTER data from 2011 to 2020 for awarded NIH grants (F32, T32, K01, K08, K23, R01, R03, R21, U01, P30) in the following medical specialties: anaesthesiology, dermatology, emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, neurology, neurosurgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, ophthalmology, orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pathology, paediatrics, physical medicine and rehabilitation, plastic surgery, psychiatry, radiation-diagnostic/oncology, surgery, and urology.
NIH grant awardees for the years 2011-2020 INTERVENTION: None PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The following measures were studied: (1) number of grants by specialty, (2) number of grants per active physician in each specialty, (3) total dollar amount of grants by specialty, (4) total dollar amount of grants per active physician in each specialty and (5) mean dollar amount awarded by specialty for each grant type. We investigated whether any of these measures varied between medical specialties.
In general, internal medicine/medicine, psychiatry, paediatrics, pathology and neurology received the most grants per year, had the highest number of grants per active physician, had the highest total amount of funding and had the highest amount of funding per active physician, whereas fields like emergency medicine, plastic surgery, orthopaedics, and obstetrics and gynaecology had the lowest. The mean dollar amount awarded by grant type differed significantly between specialties (p value less than the Bonferroni-corrected alpha=0.00029).
NIH funding varies significantly between medical specialties. This may affect research progress and the careers of scientists and may affect patient outcomes in less well funded specialties.
不同医学专业获得的美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的差异可能会影响资助较少的专业的研究和患者结局。本研究旨在评估 NIH 资金是如何按医学专业进行分配的。本研究通过对 NIH RePORTER(研究组合在线报告工具支出和结果)2011 年至 2020 年数据的回顾性分析,评估了不同医学专业在资金数量方面的差异和趋势,该研究评估了不同医学专业在资金数量方面的差异和趋势(F32、T32、K01、K08、K23、R01、R03、R21、U01、P30)。
纵向横断面研究
NIH RePORTER 数据来自 2011 年至 2020 年,涵盖了以下医学专业的 NIH 资助(F32、T32、K01、K08、K23、R01、R03、R21、U01、P30):麻醉学、皮肤病学、急诊医学、家庭医学、内科、神经病学、神经外科学、妇产科、眼科学、矫形外科学、耳鼻喉科学、病理学、儿科学、物理医学和康复、整形外科学、精神病学、放射诊断/肿瘤学、外科学和泌尿科。
2011 年至 2020 年 NIH 资助获得者
无
研究了以下措施:(1)按专业划分的资助数量,(2)每个专业中每位在职医生的资助数量,(3)按专业划分的资助总额,(4)每个专业中每位在职医生的资助总额,以及(5)按专业划分的每项资助类型的平均资助金额。我们调查了这些措施是否在不同的医学专业之间存在差异。
一般来说,内科/医学、精神病学、儿科学、病理学和神经病学每年获得的资助最多,每位在职医生获得的资助数量最多,获得的总资助金额最高,每位在职医生获得的资助金额也最高,而急诊医学、整形外科学、矫形外科学和妇产科等领域的资助则最少。按资助类型划分的平均资助金额在专业之间差异显著(p 值小于 Bonferroni 校正的α=0.00029)。
NIH 资金在医学专业之间差异显著。这可能会影响研究进展和科学家的职业发展,并可能影响资助较少的专业的患者结局。