Caglayan Berna Cagla, Basakci Calik Bilge, Gur Kabul Elif, Karasu Ugur
Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Okan Universit, Istanbul, Turkey.
School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2023 Jan;19(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.reumae.2022.01.003.
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain, sleep disorder, fatigue, other somatic symptoms. Clinical pilates method is therapeutic modality that can be used in improving the symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of reformer pilates exercises in individuals with FM and to compare with home mat pilates.
Twenty-eight women (age mean=45.61±10.31) diagnosed with FM were included in this study. Participants were randomly divided into two groups as reformer pilates group (n=14) and home mat pilates group (n=14). Reformer and home mat pilates exercises were given 2 times a week for 6 weeks. The number of painful regions with Pain Location Inventory (PLI), clinical status with Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), lower extremity muscle strength with Chair Stand Test, functional mobility with The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), biopsychosocial status with Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach-Biopsychosocial Questionnaire (BETY-BQ) and quality of life with Short Form-36 (SF-36) were evaluated. All evaluations were assessed before and after treatment.
There was a significant difference in FIQ and chair stand test in reformer pilates group, while in PLI, FIQ, BETY-BQ vs. SF-36 Physical Component in home group (p<0.05) compared with baseline. There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of delta value (p>0.05).
Reformer pilates exercises had positive effects on clinical status and muscle strength while home mat pilates exercises had positive effects on the number of painful regions, clinical status, biopsychosocial status and physical component quality of life. Clinical trial registration number NCT04218630.
纤维肌痛(FM)是一种以广泛疼痛、睡眠障碍、疲劳及其他躯体症状为特征的慢性疾病。临床普拉提方法是一种可用于改善这些症状的治疗方式。本研究旨在调查改良普拉提练习对纤维肌痛患者的有效性,并与家庭垫上普拉提进行比较。
本研究纳入了28名被诊断为纤维肌痛的女性(平均年龄=45.61±10.31岁)。参与者被随机分为两组,即改良普拉提组(n=14)和家庭垫上普拉提组(n=14)。改良普拉提和家庭垫上普拉提练习每周进行2次,共6周。使用疼痛部位清单(PLI)评估疼痛区域数量,使用纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)评估临床状况,使用椅子站立测试评估下肢肌肉力量,使用定时起立行走测试(TUG)评估功能活动能力,使用认知运动疗法-生物心理社会问卷(BETY-BQ)评估生物心理社会状况,使用简明健康调查量表(SF-36)评估生活质量。所有评估均在治疗前后进行。
改良普拉提组在FIQ和椅子站立测试方面有显著差异,而家庭组在PLI、FIQ、BETY-BQ与SF-36身体成分方面与基线相比有显著差异(p<0.05)。两组之间的差值无统计学差异(p>0.05)。
改良普拉提练习对临床状况和肌肉力量有积极影响,而家庭垫上普拉提练习对疼痛区域数量、临床状况、生物心理社会状况和身体成分生活质量有积极影响。临床试验注册号NCT04218630。