Winchester Nicole E, Shrestha Nabin K, Kim Priscilla, Tereshchenko Larisa G, Rothberg Michael B
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Department of Infectious Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 28;227(6):800-805. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad003.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 immunity has declined with subsequent waves and accrual of viral mutations. In vitro studies raise concern for immune escape by BA.4/BA.5, and a study in Qatar showed moderate protection, but these findings have yet to be reproduced.
This retrospective cohort study included individuals tested for coronavirus disease 2019 by polymerase chain reaction during Delta or BA.1/BA.2 and retested during BA.4/BA.5. The preventable fraction (PF) was calculated as ratio of the infection to the hospitalization rate for initially positive patients divided by the ratio for initially negative patients, stratified by age and adjusted for age, sex, comorbid conditions, and vaccination using logistic regression.
A total of 20 987 patients met inclusion criteria. Prior Delta infection provided no protection against BA.4/BA.5 infection (adjusted PF, 11.9% [95% confidence interval, .8%-21.8%]); P = .04) and minimal protection against hospitalization (10.7% [4.9%-21.7%]; P = .003). In adjusted models, prior BA.1/BA.2 infection provided 45.9% (95% confidence interval, 36.2%-54.1%; P < .001) protection against BA.4/BA.5 reinfection and 18.8% (10.3%-28.3%; (P < .001) protection against hospitalization. Up-to-date vaccination provided modest protection against reinfection with BA.4/BA.5 and hospitalization.
Prior infection with BA.1/BA.2 and up-to-date vaccination provided modest protection against infection with BA.4/BA.5 and hospitalization, while prior Delta infection provided minimal protection against hospitalization and none against infection.
随着后续疫情浪潮以及病毒突变的积累,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2免疫力有所下降。体外研究引发了对BA.4/BA.5免疫逃逸的担忧,卡塔尔的一项研究显示有一定程度的保护作用,但这些发现尚未得到重复验证。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了在德尔塔毒株或BA.1/BA.2毒株流行期间接受过2019冠状病毒病聚合酶链反应检测,并在BA.4/BA.5毒株流行期间再次接受检测的个体。可预防率(PF)的计算方法是,将初始检测呈阳性患者的感染率与住院率之比除以初始检测呈阴性患者的相应比值,按年龄分层,并使用逻辑回归对年龄、性别、合并症和疫苗接种情况进行调整。
共有20987名患者符合纳入标准。既往感染德尔塔毒株对BA.4/BA.5感染无保护作用(调整后的PF为11.9%[95%置信区间,0.8%-21.8%];P = 0.04),对住院的保护作用极小(10.7%[4.9%-21.7%];P = 0.003)。在调整模型中,既往感染BA.1/BA.2毒株对BA.4/BA.5再感染提供了45.9%(95%置信区间,36.2%-54.1%;P < 0.001)的保护作用,对住院提供了18.8%(10.3%-28.3%;P < 0.001)的保护作用。最新接种疫苗对BA.4/BA.5再感染和住院提供了适度的保护作用。
既往感染BA.1/BA.2毒株和最新接种疫苗对BA.4/BA.5感染和住院提供了适度的保护作用,而既往感染德尔塔毒株对住院提供的保护作用极小,对感染则无保护作用。