Suppr超能文献

调整引流量中的淀粉酶水平不能改善胰瘘预测。

Adjusting Drain Fluid Amylase for Drain Volume Does Not Improve Pancreatic Fistula Prediction.

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2023 Apr;284:312-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.030. Epub 2023 Jan 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Drain fluid amylase (DFA) levels have been used to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and guide postoperative drain management. Optimal DFA cutoff thresholds vary between studies, thereby prompting investigation of an alternative assessment technique. As DFA measurements could, in theory, be distorted by variations in ascites fluid production, we hypothesized that adjusting DFA for volume corrected drain fluid amylase (vDFA) would improve CR-POPF predictive models.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients, who underwent pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) and distal pancreatectomies (DP) between 2013 and 2019, was performed. DFAs and vDFAs were measured on postoperative day (POD) 3. Clinicopathologic variables were compared between cohorts by univariable and multivariable analyses and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Patients developing a CR-POPF were more likely to be male and have elevated DFA, vDFA, and body mass index (BMI). vDFA use did not contribute to a superior CR-POPF predictive model compared to DFA-a finding consistent on subanalysis of surgery type PD versus DP. In CR-POPF predictive models, DFA, vDFA, and male sex significantly improved CR-POPF predictive models when considering both surgery subtypes, while only DFA and vDFA significantly improved models when cohorts were segregated by surgery type.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative DFA remains a preferred method of predicting CR-POPF as the proposed vDFA assessment technique only adds complexity without increased discriminability.

摘要

简介

引流液淀粉酶(DFA)水平已被用于预测临床上相关的术后胰腺瘘(CR-POPF)并指导术后引流管理。不同研究之间的最佳 DFA 截止值不同,因此需要研究替代评估技术。由于 DFA 测量值可能会因腹水产生量的变化而失真,我们假设通过调整 DFA 以校正引流液淀粉酶(vDFA)可以改善 CR-POPF 预测模型。

方法

对 2013 年至 2019 年间接受胰十二指肠切除术(PD)和胰体尾切除术(DP)的患者进行了单中心回顾性队列研究。在术后第 3 天(POD)测量 DFA 和 vDFA。通过单变量和多变量分析以及接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线比较两组之间的临床病理变量。

结果

发生 CR-POPF 的患者更可能是男性,且 DFA、vDFA 和体重指数(BMI)升高。与 DFA 相比,使用 vDFA 并不能提供更优的 CR-POPF 预测模型,这一发现与 PD 与 DP 手术类型的亚组分析一致。在 CR-POPF 预测模型中,DFA、vDFA 和男性在考虑两种手术类型时显著改善了 CR-POPF 预测模型,而仅 DFA 和 vDFA 在根据手术类型对队列进行分层时显著改善了模型。

结论

术后 DFA 仍然是预测 CR-POPF 的首选方法,因为所提出的 vDFA 评估技术仅增加了复杂性,而没有提高可区分性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验