Golbus Jessica R, Joo Hyeon, Janda Allison M, Maile Michael D, Aaronson Keith D, Engoren Milo C, Cassidy Ruth B, Kheterpal Sachin, Mathis Michael R
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine - University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
BJA Open. 2022 Dec;4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100113. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
Reliable diagnosis of heart failure during preoperative evaluation is important for perioperative management and long-term care. We aimed to quantify preoperative heart failure diagnostic accuracy and explore characteristics of patients with heart failure misdiagnoses.
We performed an observational cohort study of adults undergoing major noncardiac surgery at an academic hospital between 2015 and 2019. A preoperative clinical diagnosis of heart failure was defined using keywords from the history and clinical examination or administrative documentation. Across stratified subsamples of cases with and without clinically diagnosed heart failure, health records were intensively reviewed by an expert panel to develop an adjudicated heart failure reference standard using diagnostic criteria congruent with consensus guidelines. We calculated agreement among experts, and analysed performance of clinically diagnosed heart failure compared with the adjudicated reference standard.
Across 40 555 major noncardiac procedures, a stratified subsample of 511 patients was reviewed by the expert panel. The prevalence of heart failure was 9.1% based on clinically diagnosed compared with 13.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3-16.2%) estimated by the expert panel. Overall agreement and inter-rater reliability (kappa) among heart failure experts were 95% and 0.79, respectively. Based upon expert adjudication, heart failure was clinically diagnosed with an accuracy of 92.8% (90.6-95.1%), sensitivity 57.4% (53.1-61.7%), specificity 98.3% (97.1-99.4%), positive predictive value 83.5% (80.3-86.8%), and negative predictive value 93.8% (91.7-95.9%).
Limitations exist to the preoperative clinical diagnosis of heart failure, with nearly half of cases undiagnosed preoperatively. Considering the risks of undiagnosed heart failure, efforts to improve preoperative heart failure diagnoses are warranted.
术前评估期间对心力衰竭进行可靠诊断对于围手术期管理和长期护理至关重要。我们旨在量化术前心力衰竭诊断的准确性,并探讨心力衰竭误诊患者的特征。
我们对2015年至2019年期间在一家学术医院接受非心脏大手术的成年人进行了一项观察性队列研究。术前心力衰竭的临床诊断是根据病史、临床检查或行政文件中的关键词来定义的。在有和没有临床诊断心力衰竭的病例分层子样本中,一个专家小组对健康记录进行了深入审查,以使用与共识指南一致的诊断标准制定一个经裁定的心力衰竭参考标准。我们计算了专家之间的一致性,并分析了临床诊断的心力衰竭与经裁定的参考标准相比的表现。
在40555例非心脏大手术中,专家小组对511例患者的分层子样本进行了审查。根据临床诊断,心力衰竭的患病率为9.1%,而专家小组估计为13.3%(95%置信区间[CI],10.3 - 16.2%)。心力衰竭专家之间的总体一致性和评分者间信度(kappa)分别为95%和0.79。根据专家裁定,心力衰竭临床诊断的准确率为92.8%(90.6 - 95.1%),敏感性为57.4%(53.1 - 61.7%),特异性为98.3%(97.1 - 99.4%),阳性预测值为83.5%(80.3 - 86.8%),阴性预测值为93.8%(91.7 - 95.9%)。
术前心力衰竭的临床诊断存在局限性,近一半的病例术前未被诊断。考虑到未诊断心力衰竭的风险,有必要努力改善术前心力衰竭的诊断。