Suppr超能文献

遵循剖宫产术后围手术期疼痛管理的循证建议与更好的疼痛相关结局相关:登记数据分析

Following Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Pain Management after Cesarean Section Is Associated with Better Pain-Related Outcomes: Analysis of Registry Data.

作者信息

Zaslansky Ruth, Baumbach Philipp, Edry Ruth, Chetty Sean, Min Lim Siu, Schaub Isabelle, Cruz Jorge Jimenez, Meissner Winfried, Stamer Ulrike M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany.

Acute Pain Service, Department of Anesthesiology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa 3109601, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 14;12(2):676. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020676.

Abstract

Women who have had a Cesarean Section (CS) frequently report severe pain and pain-related interference. One reason for insufficient pain treatment might be inconsistent implementation of evidence-based guidelines. We assessed the association between implementing three elements of care recommended by guidelines for postoperative pain management and pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in women after CS. The analysis relied on an anonymized dataset of women undergoing CS, retrieved from PAIN OUT. PAIN OUT, an international perioperative pain registry, provides clinicians with treatment assessment methodology and tools for patients to assess multi-dimensional pain-related PROs on the first postoperative day. We examined whether the care included [i] regional anesthesia with a neuraxial opioid OR general anesthesia with wound infiltration or a Transvesus Abdominis Plane block; [ii] at least one non-opioid analgesic at the full daily dose; and [iii] pain assessment and recording. Credit for care was given only if all three elements were administered (= “full”); otherwise, it was “incomplete”. A “Pain Composite Score-total” (PCStotal), evaluating outcomes of pain intensity, pain-related interference with function, and side-effects, was the primary endpoint in the total cohort (women receiving GA and/or RA) or a sub-group of women with RA only. Data from 5182 women was analyzed. “Full” care was administered to 20% of women in the total cohort and to 21% in the RA sub-group. In both groups, the PCStotal was significantly lower compared to “incomplete” care (p < 0.001); this was a small-to-moderate effect size. Administering all three elements of care was associated with better pain-related outcomes after CS. These should be straightforward and inexpensive for integration into routine care after CS. However, even in this group, a high proportion of women reported poor outcomes, indicating that additional work needs to be carried out to close the evidence-practice gap so that women who have undergone CS can be comfortable when caring for themselves and their newborn.

摘要

接受过剖宫产(CS)的女性经常报告有严重疼痛及与疼痛相关的干扰。疼痛治疗不充分的一个原因可能是循证指南的实施不一致。我们评估了实施术后疼痛管理指南推荐的三项护理要素与剖宫产术后女性疼痛相关的患者报告结局(PROs)之间的关联。该分析依赖于从PAIN OUT检索到的接受剖宫产女性的匿名数据集。PAIN OUT是一个国际围手术期疼痛登记处,为临床医生提供治疗评估方法和工具,以便患者在术后第一天评估多维疼痛相关的PROs。我们检查了护理是否包括:[i] 联合使用阿片类药物的区域麻醉或联合伤口浸润的全身麻醉或腹横肌平面阻滞;[ii] 至少一种全日剂量的非阿片类镇痛药;以及[iii] 疼痛评估和记录。只有当三项要素都实施时(=“完全”)才给予护理学分;否则,即为“不完全”。“疼痛综合评分-总计”(PCStotal),用于评估疼痛强度、疼痛相关的功能干扰和副作用的结局,是整个队列(接受全身麻醉和/或区域麻醉的女性)或仅接受区域麻醉的女性亚组的主要终点。分析了5182名女性的数据。整个队列中20%的女性和区域麻醉亚组中21%的女性接受了“完全”护理。在两组中,PCStotal均显著低于“不完全”护理(p < 0.001);这是一个小到中等程度的效应量。实施所有三项护理要素与剖宫产术后更好的疼痛相关结局相关。将这些要素整合到剖宫产术后的常规护理中应该简单且成本低廉。然而,即使在这个组中,仍有很大比例的女性报告结局不佳,这表明需要开展更多工作来弥合证据与实践之间的差距,以便接受过剖宫产的女性在照顾自己和新生儿时能感到舒适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3763/9864952/b6e14ee15bdd/jcm-12-00676-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验