Economics, Policy, & Research Department (Chami, Nastos, Shaikh, Wright, Weir, Kantarevic), Ontario Medical Association; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Shah), University Health Network; University of Toronto (Shah, Kantarevic); Department of Anesthesia (Tenenbein), University Health Network; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Tenenbein), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lougheed), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Section of Emergency Medicine (Lougheed), Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ont.; University Health Network (Mizdrak); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Mizdrak), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Goderich, Western University (Conlon), London, Ont.; Botnar Research Centre (Wright), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Hospital for Sick Children (Wright); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wright), and Canadian Centre for Health Economics (Weir), and Department of Economics (Kantarevic), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute of Labour Economics (Kantarevic), Deutsche Post Foundation, Bonn, Germany
Economics, Policy, & Research Department (Chami, Nastos, Shaikh, Wright, Weir, Kantarevic), Ontario Medical Association; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Shah), University Health Network; University of Toronto (Shah, Kantarevic); Department of Anesthesia (Tenenbein), University Health Network; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Tenenbein), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Family Medicine (Lougheed), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.; Section of Emergency Medicine (Lougheed), Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, Ont.; University Health Network (Mizdrak); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Mizdrak), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Goderich, Western University (Conlon), London, Ont.; Botnar Research Centre (Wright), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Hospital for Sick Children (Wright); Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Wright), and Canadian Centre for Health Economics (Weir), and Department of Economics (Kantarevic), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Institute of Labour Economics (Kantarevic), Deutsche Post Foundation, Bonn, Germany.
CMAJ. 2023 Jan 23;195(3):E108-E114. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.212051.
Uptake of virtual care increased substantially during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a shift from in-person to virtual visits by primary care physicians was associated with increased use of emergency departments among their enrolled patients.
We conducted an observational study of monthly virtual visits and emergency department visits from Apr. 1, 2020, to Mar. 31, 2021, using administrative data from Ontario, Canada. We used multivariable regression analysis to estimate the association between the proportion of a physician's visits that were delivered virtually and the number of emergency department visits among their enrolled patients.
The proportion of virtual visits was higher among female, younger and urban physicians, and the number of emergency department visits was lower among patients of female and urban physicians. In an unadjusted analysis, a 1% increase in a physician's proportion of virtual visits was found to be associated with 11.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.1-11.8) fewer emergency department visits per 1000 rostered patients. After controlling for covariates, we observed no statistically significant change in emergency department visits per 1% increase in the proportion of virtual visits (0.2, 95% CI -0.5 to 0.9).
We did not find evidence that patients substituted emergency department visits in the context of decreased availability of in-person care with their family physician during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should focus on the long-term impact of virtual care on access and quality of patient care.
在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,虚拟医疗的使用率大幅上升。本研究旨在评估初级保健医生从面对面就诊向虚拟就诊的转变是否与他们所负责的患者中急诊就诊的增加有关。
我们使用来自加拿大安大略省的行政数据,对 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日期间的每月虚拟就诊和急诊就诊进行了一项观察性研究。我们使用多变量回归分析来估计医生的虚拟就诊比例与他们所负责的患者中急诊就诊数量之间的关联。
女性、年轻和城市医生的虚拟就诊比例较高,而女性和城市医生的患者急诊就诊次数较低。在未调整的分析中,医生的虚拟就诊比例每增加 1%,其负责的患者每 1000 名患者中急诊就诊的次数就会减少 11.0(95%置信区间[CI] 10.1-11.8)。在控制了协变量后,我们观察到虚拟就诊比例每增加 1%,急诊就诊次数没有统计学意义上的变化(0.2,95%CI -0.5 至 0.9)。
我们没有发现证据表明,在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,当面对面护理的可及性降低时,患者会用急诊来替代家庭医生的治疗。未来的研究应关注虚拟护理对患者护理的可及性和质量的长期影响。