Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Durvalumab and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With N3 Lymph Node Metastasis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and durvalumab for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) with N3 lymph node metastasis remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who received CCRT and durvalumab (durvalumab cohort) and compare their outcomes with those of patients who received CCRT alone (CCRT-alone cohort).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of patients who had received treatment between November 2008 and February 2022 and were followed up for at least 3 months were retrospectively analyzed. Local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Toxicity was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

The data of 29 patients were analyzed (median follow-up period: 22 months). Among them, 17 received CCRT alone and 12 received CCRT and durvalumab. There were 14 patients with stage IIIB and 15 with stage IIIC LA-NSCLC. The durvalumab cohort (89%) had a significantly higher 1-year local control rate than the CCRT-alone cohort (47%; p=0.035). No significant difference was observed in either progression-free or overall survival between the two cohorts. Grade ≥2 pneumonitis was observed in 6 (50%) and 7 (41%) patients in the durvalumab and CCRT-alone cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CCRT with durvalumab may be effective against LA-NSCLC with N3 lymph node metastasis. The incidence of grade 2 pneumonitis was slightly higher in the durvalumab cohort than in the CCRT-alone cohort, suggesting the need for careful patient monitoring after treatment.