Miura Satoru, Nishio Makoto, Akamatsu Hiroaki, Goto Yasushi, Hayashi Hidetoshi, Gemma Akihiko, Yoshino Ichiro, Misumi Toshihiro, Hata Akito, Hataji Osamu, Fujita Kohei, Seike Masahiro, Yanagitani Noriko, Nishino Kazumi, Hara Satoshi, Saito Ryota, Mori Masahide, Tsuda Takeshi, Iwasawa Shunichiro, Nakagawa Shintaro, Mitsudomi Tetsuya
Department of Internal Medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Feb 24;4(3):100484. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100484. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in previously treated patients with NSCLC have been established in the registrational phase 3 OAK trial. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab monotherapy in a large real-world cohort to confirm the reproducibility of the results of the registrational trial.
This was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational study. Consecutive patients with previously treated NSCLC scheduled to receive atezolizumab monotherapy were enrolled. The primary end point was the 18-month overall survival (OS) rate. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs was evaluated.
Overall, 1002 patients were included in the safety analysis set and 1000 in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 11.5 months. Of the full analysis set, 62% were ineligible for the OAK trial (OAK-unlike subpopulation). The 18-month OS rate was 41.1%, with a median OS of 13.0 months (95% confidence interval: 12.2-15.1). The 18-month OS rate was 49.4% and 36.1% in OAK-like and OAK-unlike subpopulations, respectively; that in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2 was 14.3%. The incidence of AEs overall, in the OAK-like, and OAK-unlike subpopulations was 43.9%, 46.2%, and 42.5%; that of immune-related AEs was 19.0%, 20.1%, and 18.3%, respectively.
The findings suggest that atezolizumab may be effective and safe for previously treated patients with NSCLC in real-world settings; however, atezolizumab administration should be considered carefully regarding the benefit-risk balance for the OAK-unlike subpopulation, especially in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2.
阿替利珠单抗在既往接受过治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的疗效和安全性已在注册性3期OAK试验中得到确立。在本研究中,我们评估了阿替利珠单抗单药治疗在一个大型真实世界队列中的有效性和安全性,以确认注册性试验结果的可重复性。
这是一项多中心、前瞻性、单臂观察性研究。纳入了计划接受阿替利珠单抗单药治疗的既往接受过治疗的NSCLC连续患者。主要终点是18个月总生存率(OS)。评估了不良事件(AE)和免疫相关AE的发生率。
总体而言,1002例患者纳入安全性分析集,1000例纳入完整分析集。中位随访时间为11.5个月。在完整分析集中,62%的患者不符合OAK试验标准(非OAK样亚组)。18个月OS率为41.1%,中位OS为13.0个月(95%置信区间:12.2 - 15.1)。在OAK样和非OAK样亚组中,18个月OS率分别为49.4%和36.1%;东部肿瘤协作组体能状态大于或等于2的患者中该率为14.3%。总体、OAK样和非OAK样亚组中AE的发生率分别为43.9%、46.2%和42.5%;免疫相关AE的发生率分别为19.0%、20.1%和18.3%。
研究结果表明,在真实世界环境中,阿替利珠单抗对于既往接受过治疗的NSCLC患者可能有效且安全;然而,对于非OAK样亚组,尤其是东部肿瘤协作组体能状态大于或等于2的患者,在考虑阿替利珠单抗治疗时应仔细权衡获益 - 风险平衡。