Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
AIDS. 2023 Jul 15;37(9):1345-1360. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003579. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
People with HIV (PWH) experience a greater risk of morbidity and mortality following COVID-19 infection, and poorer immunological responses to several vaccines. We explored existing evidence regarding the immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in PWH compared with controls.
We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases from January 2020 until June 2022, in addition to conference databases, to identify studies comparing clinical, immunogenicity, and safety in PWH and controls. We compared results between those with low (<350 cells/μl) and high (>350 cells/μl) CD4 + T-cell counts where possible. We performed a meta-analysis of seroconversion and neutralization responses to calculate a pooled risk ratio as the measure of effect.
We identified 30 studies, including four reporting clinical effectiveness, 27 immunogenicity, and 12 reporting safety outcomes. PWH were 3% [risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.95-0.99] less likely to seroconvert and 5% less likely to demonstrate neutralization responses (risk ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) following a primary vaccine schedule. Having a CD4 + T-cell count less than 350 cells/μl (risk ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99) compared with a CD4 + T-cell count more than 350 cells/μl, and receipt of a non-mRNA vaccine in PWH compared with controls (risk ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96) were associated with reduced seroconversion. Two studies reported worse clinical outcomes in PWH.
Although vaccines appear well tolerated in PWH, this group experience poorer immunological responses following vaccination than controls, particularly with non-mRNA vaccines and low CD4 + T-cell counts. PWH should be prioritized for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, especially PWH with more advanced immunodeficiency.
感染 COVID-19 后,艾滋病毒(HIV)感染者(PWH)的发病率和死亡率更高,并且对几种疫苗的免疫反应也更差。我们探讨了现有的关于与对照相比,PWH 接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的免疫原性、有效性和安全性的证据。
我们从 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月对电子数据库进行了系统检索,并补充了会议数据库,以确定比较 PWH 和对照者临床、免疫原性和安全性的研究。在可能的情况下,我们比较了 CD4+T 细胞计数低(<350 个/μl)和高(>350 个/μl)的患者之间的结果。我们对血清转换和中和反应进行了荟萃分析,以计算出作为效应衡量标准的汇总风险比。
我们确定了 30 项研究,其中 4 项报告了临床疗效,27 项报告了免疫原性,12 项报告了安全性结果。与对照组相比,PWH 血清转换的可能性低 3%(风险比 0.97,95%置信区间 [95%CI] 0.95-0.99),中和反应的可能性低 5%(风险比 0.95,95%CI 0.91-0.99)。与 CD4+T 细胞计数大于 350 个/μl 相比,CD4+T 细胞计数小于 350 个/μl(风险比 0.91,95%CI 0.83-0.99)和 PWH 接受非 mRNA 疫苗与对照组相比(风险比 0.86,95%CI 0.77-0.96)与血清转换减少相关。有两项研究报告了 PWH 的临床结局较差。
尽管疫苗在 PWH 中似乎耐受性良好,但与对照组相比,该人群在接种疫苗后免疫反应较差,特别是非 mRNA 疫苗和 CD4+T 细胞计数较低的情况下。应优先为 PWH 接种 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗,尤其是 CD4+T 细胞计数较低的免疫功能更差的 PWH。