Washington University in St. Louis, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America.
Washington University in St. Louis, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America; Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, United States of America.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Jun;129:107202. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107202. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
Low-income Americans have higher rates of smoking and a greater burden of smoking-related disease. In the United States, smokers in every state can access evidence-based telephone counseling through free tobacco quitlines. However, quitlines target smokers who are ready to quit in the next 30 days, which can exclude many low-income smokers. A smoke-free homes intervention may help engage smokers in tobacco control services who are not yet ready to quit. Previous research in low-income populations suggests that receiving a smoke-free homes intervention is associated with higher quit rates. This study tests whether, at a population level, expanding on quitlines to include a smoke-free homes intervention for smokers not ready to quit could engage more low-income smokers and increase long-term cessation rates.
In a Hybrid Type 2 design, participants are recruited from 211 helplines in 9 states and randomly assigned to standard quitline or quitline plus smoke-free homes intervention arms. Participants in both arms are initially offered quitline services. In the quitline plus smoke-free homes condition, participants who decline the quitline are then offered a smoke-free homes intervention. Participants complete a baseline and follow-up surveys at 3 and 6 months. Those who have not yet quit at the 3-month follow-up are re-offered the interventions, which differ by study arm. The primary study outcome is self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence from smoking at 6-month follow-up.
This real-world cessation trial involving 9 state tobacco quitlines will help inform whether offering smoke-free homes as an alternative intervention could engage more low-income smokers with evidence-based interventions and increase overall cessation rates. This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Study Identifier: NCT04311983).
美国低收入人群的吸烟率较高,且与吸烟相关的疾病负担也更重。在美国,每个州的吸烟者都可以通过免费的烟草戒烟热线获得基于证据的电话咨询。然而,戒烟热线针对的是在未来 30 天内准备戒烟的吸烟者,这可能会排除许多低收入吸烟者。无烟家庭干预可能有助于吸引那些尚未准备好戒烟的吸烟者参与烟草控制服务。先前在低收入人群中的研究表明,接受无烟家庭干预与更高的戒烟率相关。本研究检验了在人群层面上,将戒烟热线扩展到为尚未准备好戒烟的吸烟者提供无烟家庭干预,是否可以吸引更多的低收入吸烟者并提高长期戒烟率。
采用混合 2 型设计,从 9 个州的 211 条热线招募参与者,并随机分配到标准戒烟热线或戒烟热线加无烟家庭干预组。两组参与者最初都提供戒烟热线服务。在戒烟热线加无烟家庭干预组中,拒绝戒烟热线的参与者随后会被提供无烟家庭干预。参与者在基线和 3 个月和 6 个月时完成随访调查。在 3 个月随访时尚未戒烟的参与者会被重新提供干预措施,具体措施因研究臂而异。主要研究结果是在 6 个月随访时自我报告的 7 天点吸烟戒断率。
这项涉及 9 个州烟草戒烟热线的真实世界戒烟试验将有助于确定提供无烟家庭干预作为替代干预措施是否可以吸引更多的低收入吸烟者参与基于证据的干预措施,并提高整体戒烟率。本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(研究标识符:NCT04311983)。