Suppr超能文献

在观察性研究中,永生时间偏倚对检测抗纤维化治疗与特发性肺纤维化患者生存率之间关联的影响:一项模拟研究。

The influence of immortal time bias in observational studies examining associations of antifibrotic therapy with survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A simulation study.

作者信息

Zheng Qiang, Otahal Petr, Cox Ingrid A, de Graaff Barbara, Campbell Julie A, Ahmad Hasnat, Walters E Haydn, Palmer Andrew J

机构信息

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence for Pulmonary Fibrosis, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Apr 11;10:1157706. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1157706. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immortal time bias (ITB) has been overlooked in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to identify the presence of ITB in observational studies examining associations between antifibrotic therapy and survival in patients with IPF and illustrate how ITB may affect effect size estimates of those associations.

METHODS

Immortal time bias was identified in observational studies using the ITB Study Assessment Checklist. We used a simulation study to illustrate how ITB may affect effect size estimates of antifibrotic therapy on survival in patients with IPF based on four statistical techniques including time-fixed, exclusion, time-dependent and landmark methods.

RESULTS

Of the 16 included IPF studies, ITB was detected in 14 studies, while there were insufficient data for assessment in two others. Our simulation study showed that use of time-fixed [hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.64] and exclusion methods (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.92) overestimated the effectiveness of antifibrotic therapy on survival in simulated subjects with IPF, in comparison of the time-dependent method (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.09). The influence of ITB was mitigated using the 1 year landmark method (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.81), compared to the time-fixed method.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of antifibrotic therapy on survival in IPF can be overestimated in observational studies, if ITB is mishandled. This study adds to the evidence for addressing the influence of ITB in IPF and provides several recommendations to minimize ITB. Identifying the presence of ITB should be routinely considered in future IPF studies, with the time-dependent method being an optimal approach to minimize ITB.

摘要

背景

特发性肺纤维化(IPF)研究中一直忽视了永存时间偏倚(ITB)。我们旨在确定在观察性研究中ITB是否存在,这些研究探讨抗纤维化治疗与IPF患者生存率之间的关联,并说明ITB如何影响这些关联效应大小的估计。

方法

使用ITB研究评估清单在观察性研究中识别永存时间偏倚。我们进行了一项模拟研究,以说明基于时间固定、排除、时间依赖和标志性方法这四种统计技术,ITB如何影响抗纤维化治疗对IPF患者生存率效应大小的估计。

结果

在纳入的16项IPF研究中,14项研究检测到ITB,另外两项研究缺乏评估数据。我们的模拟研究表明,与时间依赖方法(风险比[HR]0.93,95%置信区间[CI]0.79 - 1.09)相比,使用时间固定方法(HR 0.55,95% CI 0.47 - 0.64)和排除方法(HR 0.79,95% CI 0.67 - 0.92)高估了抗纤维化治疗对模拟IPF患者生存率的有效性。与时间固定方法相比,使用1年标志性方法(HR 0.69,95% CI 0.58 - 0.81)可减轻ITB的影响。

结论

在观察性研究中,如果ITB处理不当,抗纤维化治疗对IPF患者生存率的有效性可能会被高估。本研究增加了应对IPF中ITB影响的证据,并提供了一些尽量减少ITB的建议。在未来的IPF研究中应常规考虑识别ITB的存在,时间依赖方法是尽量减少ITB的最佳方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8429/10126672/055418594418/fmed-10-1157706-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验