Suppr超能文献

ARDS 患者有和没有 COVID-19 肺炎时的拔管时间。

Time to Extubation Among ARDS Subjects With and Without COVID-19 Pneumonia.

机构信息

Respiratory Care Division, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California.

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco at San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2023 Oct;68(10):1340-1346. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09876. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia from COVID-19 that results in ARDS may require invasive mechanical ventilation. This retrospective study assessed the characteristics and outcomes of subjects with COVID-19-associated ARDS versus ARDS (non-COVID) during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The primary objective was to determine whether mechanical ventilation duration differed between these cohorts and identify other potential contributory factors.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 73 subjects admitted between March 1 and August 12, 2020, with either COVID-19-associated ARDS (37) or ARDS (36) who were managed with the lung protective ventilator protocol and required >48 h of mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria were the following: <18 years old or the patient required tracheostomy or interfacility transfer. Demographic and baseline clinical data were collected at ARDS onset (ARDS day 0), with subsequent data collected on ARDS days 1-3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21. Comparisons were made by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (continuous variables) and chi-square test (categorical variables) stratified by COVID-19 status. A Cox proportional hazards model assessed the cause-specific hazard ratio for extubation.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) mechanical ventilation duration among the subjects who survived to extubation was longer in those with COVID-19-ARDS versus the subjects with non-COVID ARDS: 10 (6-20) d versus 4 (2-8) d; < .001. Hospital mortality was not different between the two groups (22% vs 39%; = .11). The competing risks Cox proportional hazard analysis (fit among the total sample, including non-survivors) revealed that improved compliance of the respiratory system and oxygenation were associated with the probability of extubation. Oxygenation improved at a lower rate in the subjects with COVID-19-associated ARDS than in the subjects with non-COVID ARDS.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical ventilation duration was longer in subjects with COVID-19-associated ARDS compared with the subjects with non-COVID ARDS, which may be explained by a lower rate of improvement in oxygenation status.

摘要

背景

由 COVID-19 引起的肺炎导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征可能需要进行有创机械通气。本回顾性研究评估了 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行的前 6 个月期间,COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者与非 COVID-19 ARDS 患者的特征和结局。主要目的是确定这两组患者的机械通气时间是否存在差异,并确定其他潜在的促成因素。

方法

我们回顾性地确定了 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 8 月 12 日期间收治的 73 名患者,这些患者均患有 COVID-19 相关 ARDS(37 名)或非 COVID-19 ARDS(36 名),均采用肺保护性通气方案治疗,需要>48 小时的机械通气。排除标准为:年龄<18 岁或患者需要行气管切开术或院内转科。在 ARDS 发病时(ARDS 第 0 天)收集人口统计学和基线临床数据,随后在 ARDS 第 1-3、5、7、10、14 和 21 天收集数据。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验(连续变量)和卡方检验(分类变量)对 COVID-19 状态进行分层比较。Cox 比例风险模型评估了拔管的特定原因风险比。

结果

存活至拔管的患者中,COVID-19-ARDS 患者的中位(四分位距)机械通气时间长于非 COVID-19 ARDS 患者:10(6-20)d 与 4(2-8)d;<0.001。两组间的住院死亡率无差异(22% vs 39%;=0.11)。总样本(包括非幸存者)的竞争风险 Cox 比例风险分析显示,呼吸系统顺应性和氧合改善与拔管的概率相关。COVID-19 相关 ARDS 患者的氧合改善速度低于非 COVID-19 ARDS 患者。

结论

与非 COVID-19 ARDS 患者相比,COVID-19 相关 ARDS 患者的机械通气时间更长,这可能是由于氧合状态改善的速度较慢所致。

相似文献

1
Time to Extubation Among ARDS Subjects With and Without COVID-19 Pneumonia.
Respir Care. 2023 Oct;68(10):1340-1346. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09876. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
3
Respiratory Support After Extubation in Children With Pediatric ARDS.
Respir Care. 2024 Mar 27;69(4):422-429. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11334.
7
Optimal Prone Position Duration in Patients With ARDS Due to COVID-19: The Omelette Pilot Trial.
Respir Care. 2024 Jun 28;69(7):806-818. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11192.
10
Dead space estimates may not be independently associated with 28-day mortality in COVID-19 ARDS.
Crit Care. 2021 May 17;25(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03570-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A Tangled Web of Association: The Infamous Table 2.
Respir Care. 2024 Jan 24;69(2):263-267. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11620.
2
Time to Extubation in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS.
Respir Care. 2023 Oct;68(10):1475-1476. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11411.

本文引用的文献

1
Respiratory Drive, Dyspnea, and Silent Hypoxemia: A Physiological Review in the Context of COVID-19.
Respir Care. 2022 Oct;67(10):1343-1360. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10075. Epub 2022 May 2.
2
2020 Year in Review: Mechanical Ventilation During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Respir Care. 2021 Aug;66(8):1341-1362. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09257. Epub 2021 May 10.
4
Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jan;47(1):60-73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06294-x. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Clinical features, ventilatory management, and outcome of ARDS caused by COVID-19 are similar to other causes of ARDS.
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2200-2211. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06192-2. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
7
Respiratory Mechanics and Gas Exchange in COVID-19-associated Respiratory Failure.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Sep;17(9):1158-1161. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202005-427RL.
8
COVID-19 pneumonia: ARDS or not?
Crit Care. 2020 Apr 16;24(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02880-z.
9
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验