Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel 24105, Germany.
Center for Genomic Regulation, Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Aug 11;51(14):7143-7162. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad519.
In the late 19th century, formalin fixation with paraffin-embedding (FFPE) of tissues was developed as a fixation and conservation method and is still used to this day in routine clinical and pathological practice. The implementation of state-of-the-art nucleic acid sequencing technologies has sparked much interest for using historical FFPE samples stored in biobanks as they hold promise in extracting new information from these valuable samples. However, formalin fixation chemically modifies DNA, which potentially leads to incorrect sequences or misinterpretations in downstream processing and data analysis. Many publications have concentrated on one type of DNA damage, but few have addressed the complete spectrum of FFPE-DNA damage. Here, we review mitigation strategies in (I) pre-analytical sample quality control, (II) DNA repair treatments, (III) analytical sample preparation and (IV) bioinformatic analysis of FFPE-DNA. We then provide recommendations that are tested and illustrated with DNA from 13-year-old liver specimens, one FFPE preserved and one fresh frozen, applying target-enriched sequencing. Thus, we show how DNA damage can be compensated, even when using low quantities (50 ng) of fragmented FFPE-DNA (DNA integrity number 2.0) that cannot be amplified well (Q129 bp/Q41 bp = 5%). Finally, we provide a checklist called 'ERROR-FFPE-DNA' that summarises recommendations for the minimal information in publications required for assessing fitness-for-purpose and inter-study comparison when using FFPE samples.
19 世纪后期,组织的福尔马林固定和石蜡包埋(FFPE)被开发为一种固定和保存方法,至今仍在常规临床和病理实践中使用。最先进的核酸测序技术的实施激发了人们对使用生物库中储存的历史 FFPE 样本的极大兴趣,因为这些样本有望从这些有价值的样本中提取新信息。然而,福尔马林固定会使 DNA 发生化学修饰,这可能导致下游处理和数据分析中的错误序列或错误解释。许多出版物都集中在一种类型的 DNA 损伤上,但很少有涉及 FFPE-DNA 损伤的完整图谱。在这里,我们回顾了(I)分析前样本质量控制、(II)DNA 修复处理、(III)分析样本制备和(IV)FFPE-DNA 的生物信息学分析中的缓解策略。然后,我们提供了经过测试的建议,并使用来自 13 岁肝脏标本的 DNA 进行了说明,其中一个是 FFPE 保存的,一个是新鲜冷冻的,应用了靶向富集测序。因此,我们展示了即使使用无法很好扩增的低量(50ng)碎片化 FFPE-DNA(DNA 完整性编号 2.0)(Q129 bp/Q41 bp=5%),也可以补偿 DNA 损伤。最后,我们提供了一个名为“ERROR-FFPE-DNA”的检查表,总结了在使用 FFPE 样本时评估适用性和研究间比较所需的最低信息出版物的建议。