Suppr超能文献

一项荟萃分析:PD-1抑制剂或蛋白酪氨酸激酶抑制剂在晚期骨肉瘤治疗中的临床价值

A meta-analysis: the clinical value of PD-1 inhibitor or protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma.

作者信息

Shi Binhao, Chang Junli, Sun Xingyuan, Ma Xiaoping, Zhao Peng, Zhou Chujie, Wang Yongjun, Yang Yanping

机构信息

Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Key Laboratory of Theory and Therapy of Muscles and Bones, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 12;13:1148735. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1148735. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

PD-1 inhibitors and TKIs have been used to treat advanced osteosarcoma, but there is still a lack of intuitive data for the comparison of their efficacy. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate their therapeutic benefits.

METHODS

A systematic methodological search of five primary electronic databases was performed. Studies with a randomized design of any type about PD-1 inhibitors or TKIs for the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma were included. The primary outcomes mainly included CBR, PFS, OS and ORR, The CR, PR, SD and AEs were the secondary outcomes. The survival period (months) of patients was taken as the main analysis data. Random-effects models were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eight immunocheckpoint inhibitors in 327 patients from 10 clinical trials were finally evaluated. For OS, TKIs [11.67 months (95% CI, 9.32-14.01)] show more obvious advantages than PD-1 inhibitors [6.37 months (95% CI, 3.96-8.78)]. For PFS, TKIs [4.79 months (95% CI, 3.33-6.24)] are longer than PD-1 inhibitors [1.46 months (95% CI, 1.23-1.69)]. Although there was no fatal event, attention should still be paid, especially during the combined application of PD-1 inhibitors with TKIs since their obvious AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that patients with advanced osteosarcoma, TKIs may be more beneficial than PD-1 inhibitors. TKIs combined with PD-1 inhibitors has a bright future in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma, but we should always pay attention to the strong side effects.

摘要

背景

PD-1抑制剂和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)已被用于治疗晚期骨肉瘤,但仍缺乏直观数据来比较它们的疗效。我们进行了一项荟萃分析以评估它们的治疗益处。

方法

对五个主要电子数据库进行了系统的方法学检索。纳入了任何类型的关于PD-1抑制剂或TKIs治疗晚期骨肉瘤的随机设计研究。主要结局主要包括临床获益率(CBR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和客观缓解率(ORR),完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)、疾病稳定(SD)和不良事件(AEs)为次要结局。将患者的生存期(月)作为主要分析数据。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

最终评估了来自10项临床试验的327例患者中的8种免疫检查点抑制剂。对于总生存期,TKIs[11.67个月(95%可信区间,9.32 - 14.01)]比PD-1抑制剂[6.37个月(95%可信区间,3.96 - 8.78)]显示出更明显的优势。对于无进展生存期,TKIs[4.79个月(95%可信区间,3.33 - 6.24)]比PD-1抑制剂[1.46个月(95%可信区间,1.23 - 1.69)]更长。虽然没有致命事件,但仍应予以关注,尤其是在PD-1抑制剂与TKIs联合应用期间,因为它们有明显的不良事件。

结论

本研究结果表明,对于晚期骨肉瘤患者,TKIs可能比PD-1抑制剂更有益。TKIs与PD-1抑制剂联合应用在晚期骨肉瘤治疗中具有光明前景,但我们应始终关注其强烈的副作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/838a/10291171/bef4cb1b0afb/fonc-13-1148735-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验