Suppr超能文献

拉泽替尼对比吉非替尼作为 - 突变晚期非小细胞肺癌患者一线治疗药物:LASER301 研究结果。

Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With -Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 10;41(26):4208-4217. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00515. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with -mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

Overall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; < .001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; = .116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles.

CONCLUSION

Lazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of -mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

摘要

目的

拉泽替尼是一种强效的、可穿透中枢神经系统的第三代表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂。这项全球性的 III 期研究(LASER301)比较了拉泽替尼与吉非替尼在未经系统治疗的 - 突变(外显子 19 缺失[ex19del]/L858R)局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的疗效。

患者和方法

患者年龄在 18 岁及以上,且无先前的全身抗癌治疗史。允许伴有中枢神经系统转移且神经功能稳定的患者入组。患者按突变状态和种族 1:1 随机分配至拉泽替尼 240mg 每日 1 次口服或吉非替尼 250mg 每日 1 次口服。主要终点为研究者评估的 RECIST v1.1 无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

总体而言,393 例患者在 13 个国家的 96 个地点接受了双盲研究治疗。与吉非替尼相比,拉泽替尼的中位 PFS 显著延长(20.6 9.7 个月;风险比[HR],0.45;95%CI,0.34 至 0.58;<.001)。拉泽替尼在所有预设亚组中均显示出一致的 PFS 获益。两组的客观缓解率均为 76%(比值比,0.99;95%CI,0.62 至 1.59)。拉泽替尼的中位缓解持续时间为 19.4 个月(95%CI,16.6 至 24.9),而吉非替尼为 8.3 个月(95%CI,6.9 至 10.9)。中期分析时,总生存数据不成熟(29%成熟度)。拉泽替尼组 18 个月的生存率为 80%,吉非替尼组为 72%(HR,0.74;95%CI,0.51 至 1.08;=.116)。两种治疗方法的观察到的安全性与之前报道的安全性一致。

结论

与吉非替尼相比,拉泽替尼在一线治疗 - 突变的晚期 NSCLC 中显示出显著的疗效改善,且安全性可管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验