Department of Trauma Surgery, AIIMS Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jan;34(1):279-283. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03614-x. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
Perioperative pain control in patients with orthopaedic trauma/extremity fractures has gained a lot of attraction from the scientific community in the last two decades. In addition to multimodal analgesia, the use of non-opioid drugs like gabapentinoids for pain relief is gradually finding its place in several orthopaedic subspecialties like spinal surgery, arthroplasty, and arthroscopic procedures. We envisage investigating the effectiveness of gabapentin in perioperative pain control in patients with extremity fractures undergoing surgical fixation.
This was a retrospective comparative study conducted between January 2020 and January 2022. Patients with isolated fractures of the extremity involving long bones who were treated at our trauma centre, during the study period were divided into two groups based on the analgesics they received. Patients who received gabapentin and paracetamol were placed in group GP and those who received only paracetamol were assigned group NGP. Gabapentin was given in a single dose of 300 mg 4 h before surgery. Postoperatively, they were given 300 mg 12 hourly for 2 days. All patients in our trauma centre are usually managed with parenteral paracetamol administration pre and postoperatively. VAS score was calculated postoperatively at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Patients requiring additional analgesics for pain relief were administered intravenous tramadol or a buprenorphine patch was applied. Patients in both groups were compared in terms of pain control, the additional requirement of opioid analgesics, and any adverse event related to medications.
One hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled in the study. Out of 65 patients in the NGP group (non-gabapentin group), 74% of patients received additional opioid analgesics apart from paracetamol. Out of the 54 patients in the GP group (gabapentin group), only 41% required additional opioid analgesia for pain control. There was a significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups (p < 0.01). VAS scores were not significantly different between the two groups at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Gender and fracture morphology did not affect opioid intake in the GP group. However, in the non-gabapentin group, there was a significant difference in opioid requirement in patients with intraarticular fractures (p < 0.01).
Analgesic requirements vary from patient to patient depending on the injury's severity and surgery duration. However, there are no strict guidelines for pain relief in limb trauma surgeries which often leads to overuse and opioid-related complications or underuse and chronic pain. Gabapentinoids can supplement the analgesic effect of paracetamol in trauma patients during the perioperative period, decreasing the need for opioids.
在过去的二十年中,骨科创伤/四肢骨折患者的围手术期疼痛控制引起了科学界的极大关注。除了多模式镇痛外,加巴喷丁类等非阿片类药物在脊柱手术、关节置换和关节镜手术等多个骨科亚专业中的应用也逐渐得到认可。我们设想研究加巴喷丁在接受手术固定的四肢骨折患者围手术期疼痛控制中的有效性。
这是一项回顾性对比研究,于 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间进行。在研究期间,我们将在创伤中心接受治疗的单纯累及长骨的四肢骨折患者分为两组,依据他们接受的镇痛药物进行分组。接受加巴喷丁和扑热息痛治疗的患者归入 GP 组,仅接受扑热息痛治疗的患者归入 NGP 组。术前 4 小时给予加巴喷丁 300mg 单次剂量,术后每 12 小时给予 300mg,持续 2 天。我们创伤中心的所有患者通常在术前和术后给予静脉注射扑热息痛治疗。术后 2、6、12、24 和 48 小时计算视觉模拟评分(VAS)。需要额外阿片类镇痛药缓解疼痛的患者给予静脉注射曲马多或应用丁丙诺啡透皮贴剂。比较两组患者的疼痛控制、额外使用阿片类镇痛药的情况以及与药物相关的任何不良反应。
共有 119 名患者入组研究。在 65 名 NGP 组(非加巴喷丁组)患者中,74%的患者除了扑热息痛外还需要额外使用阿片类镇痛药。在 54 名 GP 组(加巴喷丁组)患者中,仅 41%的患者需要额外使用阿片类镇痛药来控制疼痛。两组之间的阿片类药物消耗量存在显著差异(p<0.01)。两组患者在术后 2、4、6、12、24 和 48 小时的 VAS 评分无显著差异。在 GP 组中,性别和骨折形态对阿片类药物摄入没有影响。然而,在非加巴喷丁组中,关节内骨折患者的阿片类药物需求存在显著差异(p<0.01)。
根据损伤严重程度和手术持续时间的不同,每位患者的镇痛需求也有所不同。然而,四肢创伤手术的疼痛缓解并没有严格的指导方针,这往往导致阿片类药物的过度使用和相关并发症,或阿片类药物的使用不足和慢性疼痛。加巴喷丁类药物可以在围手术期补充扑热息痛的镇痛效果,减少对阿片类药物的需求。