Department of Clinical Laboratory, Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 19;18(9):e0291670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291670. eCollection 2023.
The COVID-19 antibody test was developed to investigate the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, we examined whether S antibody titers measured using the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay (S-IgG), a high-throughput test method, reflects the neutralizing capacity acquired after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. To assess the antibody dynamics and neutralizing potency, we utilized a total of 457 serum samples from 253 individuals: 325 samples from 128 COVID-19 patients including 136 samples from 29 severe/critical cases (Group S), 155 samples from 71 mild/moderate cases (Group M), and 132 samples from 132 health care workers (HCWs) who have received 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccinations. The authentic virus neutralization assay, the surrogate virus neutralizing antibody test (sVNT), and the Anti-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay (N-IgG) have been performed along with the S-IgG. The S-IgG correlated well with the neutralizing activity detected by the authentic virus neutralization assay (0.8904. of Spearman's rho value, p < 0.0001) and sVNT (0.9206. of Spearman's rho value, p < 0.0001). However, 4 samples (2.3%) of S-IgG and 8 samples (4.5%) of sVNT were inconsistent with negative results for neutralizing activity of the authentic virus neutralization assay. The kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and anti-S IgG in severe cases were faster than the mild cases. All the HCWs elicited anti-S IgG titer after the second vaccination. However, the HCWs with history of COVID-19 or positive N-IgG elicited higher anti-S IgG titers than those who did not have it previously. Furthermore, it is difficult to predict the risk of breakthrough infection from anti-S IgG or sVNT antibody titers in HCWs after the second vaccination. Our data shows that the use of anti-S IgG titers as direct quantitative markers of neutralizing capacity is limited. Thus, antibody tests should be carefully interpreted when used as serological markers for diagnosis, treatment, and prophylaxis of COVID-19.
COVID-19 抗体检测旨在研究针对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的体液免疫反应。在这项研究中,我们研究了使用 SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant 检测试剂盒(S-IgG)测量的 S 抗体滴度是否反映了 SARS-CoV-2 感染或接种疫苗后获得的中和能力。为了评估抗体动态和中和效力,我们总共使用了来自 253 个人的 457 份血清样本:128 例 COVID-19 患者的 325 份样本,包括 29 例重症/危重症病例的 136 份样本(S 组),71 例轻症/中症病例的 155 份样本(M 组),以及已接受 2 剂 BNT162b2 疫苗接种的 132 名医护人员的 132 份样本。我们同时进行了真实病毒中和测定、替代病毒中和抗体测定(sVNT)和抗-N SARS-CoV-2 IgG 测定(N-IgG)。S-IgG 与真实病毒中和测定(Spearman's rho 值为 0.8904,p < 0.0001)和 sVNT(Spearman's rho 值为 0.9206,p < 0.0001)检测到的中和活性密切相关。然而,4 份 S-IgG(2.3%)样本和 8 份 sVNT(4.5%)样本的中和活性与真实病毒中和测定的阴性结果不一致。重症病例的 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体和抗-S IgG 的动力学比轻症病例更快。所有医护人员在第二次接种后均产生抗-S IgG 滴度。然而,有 COVID-19 病史或 N-IgG 阳性的医护人员比之前没有 COVID-19 病史或 N-IgG 阳性的医护人员产生更高的抗-S IgG 滴度。此外,很难从第二次接种后医护人员的抗-S IgG 或 sVNT 抗体滴度预测突破性感染的风险。我们的数据表明,使用抗-S IgG 滴度作为中和能力的直接定量标志物是有限的。因此,在将抗体检测用作 COVID-19 的诊断、治疗和预防的血清学标志物时,应仔细解释。