Suppr超能文献

评估非洲私营部门参与卫生事务的治理环境:来自多国调查的结果。

Assessing the governance environment for private sector engagement in health in Africa: Results from a multi-country survey.

机构信息

World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.

Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 6;13:04113. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04113.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The role of the private sector in health is clear in many countries but engagement can be improved. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed a global strategy in 2020 focused on engaging the private sector in health service delivery through governance in mixed health systems and detailed six governance behaviours to guide its Member States. To operationalise these global ideas into practice, the Regional Office for Africa conducted a multi-country study to understand perceptions around the six governance behaviours. This article examines the perceptions of respondents from 13 African countries on the governance environment for private sector engagement in health.

METHODS

Data were collected through an online survey that was distributed to individuals from ministries of health and their partner organisations, private sector institutions and initiatives in countries and development organisations (n = 81) across 13 countries. The survey was based on the following six governance behaviours: build understanding, enable stakeholders, nurture trust, foster relations, align structures and deliver strategy.

RESULTS

Results showed that respondents had mixed perceptions of the governance environment for private sector engagement in health in their respective countries. Although 88% of respondents (n = 63/72) were familiar with the general inclusion of the private sector in national health sector plans, 63% of respondents (n = 45/71) noted there was limited or no integration of the private sector in the health system, and further, 28% of respondents noted there was no private sector reporting in health information systems (n = 19/69). Key opportunities presented in more than one governance behaviour include: (i) increasing private sector engagement in public sector activities, (ii) establishing clear roles and responsibilities through formal partnership agreements, (iii) improving data sharing through shared health information systems, (iv) incentives and subsidies, (v) capacity building, (vi) creating norms, guidelines, and regulations and (vii) conducting joint monitoring and evaluation. Many of these outlined overlapping concepts are not exclusive to one behaviour, thus, it is evident that when targeted, there is the potential to improve numerous governance behaviours. This further reiterates the view that the governance behaviours should be understood as connected and not unrelated areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides insight into the perceptions of respondents from select African countries on the governance environment for private sector engagement in health. These findings can inform the development of strategies and interventions to support and enhance private sector engagement in health in the region.

摘要

背景

私营部门在卫生领域的作用在许多国家都很明显,但参与度仍有待提高。世界卫生组织(WHO)在 2020 年制定了一项全球战略,重点是通过混合卫生系统中的治理,引导私营部门参与卫生服务提供,并详细制定了六项治理行为,以指导其成员国。为了将这些全球理念付诸实践,非洲区域办事处进行了一项多国研究,以了解各国对私营部门参与卫生治理的六项治理行为的看法。本文探讨了来自 13 个非洲国家的受访者对私营部门参与卫生的治理环境的看法。

方法

通过在线调查收集数据,该调查分发给 13 个国家的卫生部及其合作伙伴组织、私营部门机构和倡议以及发展组织的个人(n=81)。该调查基于以下六项治理行为:建立理解、使利益相关者能够参与、培养信任、促进关系、调整结构和实施战略。

结果

结果表明,受访者对其各自国家私营部门参与卫生的治理环境存在不同看法。尽管 88%的受访者(n=63/72)熟悉国家卫生部门计划中私营部门的普遍纳入,但 63%的受访者(n=45/71)指出私营部门在卫生系统中的整合程度有限或不存在,此外,28%的受访者指出卫生信息系统中没有私营部门报告(n=19/69)。在一个以上治理行为中提出的关键机会包括:(i)增加私营部门对公共部门活动的参与;(ii)通过正式伙伴关系协议明确角色和责任;(iii)通过共享卫生信息系统改善数据共享;(iv)激励和补贴;(v)能力建设;(vi)制定规范、准则和条例;(vii)开展联合监测和评估。其中许多概述的重叠概念并非仅与一种行为相关,因此,显然有针对性地进行干预有潜力改善多项治理行为。这进一步重申了这样一种观点,即这些治理行为应被理解为相互关联而非无关的领域。

结论

本研究提供了来自选定非洲国家的受访者对私营部门参与卫生的治理环境看法的见解。这些发现可以为制定支持和加强该地区私营部门参与卫生的战略和干预措施提供信息。

相似文献

7
10
Global health initiatives in Africa - governance, priorities, harmonisation and alignment.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 18;16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):212. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1448-9.

本文引用的文献

2
Prioritizing gender equity and intersectionality in Canadian global health institutions and partnerships.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;2(10):e0001105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001105. eCollection 2022.
3
Conceptual approaches in combating health inequity: A scoping review protocol.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282858. eCollection 2023.
4
An umbrella review of intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;315:115469. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115469. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
5
Probing key informants' views of health equity within the World Health Organization's Urban HEART initiative.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):1989. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14395-z.
6
Evaluating healthy cities: A scoping review protocol.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276179. eCollection 2022.
9
Healthy Governance for Cities: Synergizing Health in All Policies (HiAP) and Healthy Cities Approaches.
J Urban Health. 2022 Apr;99(2):231-234. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00618-6. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
10
Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy: an umbrella review protocol.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 15;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00826-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验