1 Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, Unites States of America.
Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
PLoS Biol. 2023 Oct 19;21(10):e3002362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002362. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Conversations about open science have reached the mainstream, yet many open science practices such as data sharing remain uncommon. Our efforts towards openness therefore need to increase in scale and aim for a more ambitious target. We need an ecosystem not only where research outputs are openly shared but also in which transparency permeates the research process from the start and lends itself to more rigorous and collaborative research. To support this vision, this Essay provides an overview of a selection of open science initiatives from the past 2 decades, focusing on methods transparency, scholarly communication, team science, and research culture, and speculates about what the future of open science could look like. It then draws on these examples to provide recommendations for how funders, institutions, journals, regulators, and other stakeholders can create an environment that is ripe for improvement.
关于开放科学的讨论已经成为主流,但数据共享等许多开放科学实践仍然不常见。因此,我们需要扩大开放科学的规模,瞄准更高的目标。我们需要一个生态系统,不仅要公开分享研究成果,还要从一开始就使研究过程透明化,从而促进更严谨和协作的研究。为了支持这一愿景,本文概述了过去 20 年中的一些开放科学举措,重点关注方法透明度、学术交流、团队科学和研究文化,并推测开放科学的未来可能是什么样子。然后,本文借鉴这些例子,为资助者、机构、期刊、监管机构和其他利益相关者提供建议,以创造一个有利于改进的环境。