McKee Martin, de Ruijter Anniek
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Nov 22;36:100794. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100794. eCollection 2024 Jan.
The European Union has historically left health policy decisions to individual member states, cooperating only on issues like cross-border healthcare and medicine safety. However, the COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for collective action across borders. In response, in October 2020, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called for the creation of a "European Health Union". This initiative aims to enhance the protection of European citizens' health, bolster pandemic preparedness, and strengthen healthcare systems. So far, the initiative has not led to major contestation. This might be because the proposals under this heading have been rather piecemeal and are not generally seen as being part of a comprehensive vision for identifying areas where EU intervention benefit national health policy. In this contribution we propose a path forward in terms of content and process for developing a more comprehensive vision on the policy content and the process. In so doing, we are not debating the need for a European Health Union. We take for granted that the existing European Health Union presents an opportunity to deliver, now and in the future, the added benefit of harmonizing, centralizing, or coordinating health-related laws, institutions, policies and actions at EU level.
从历史上看,欧盟一直将卫生政策决策留给各个成员国,仅在跨境医疗保健和药品安全等问题上进行合作。然而,新冠疫情凸显了跨境集体行动的必要性。作为回应,2020年10月,欧盟委员会主席乌尔苏拉·冯·德·莱恩呼吁创建一个“欧洲卫生联盟”。这一倡议旨在加强对欧洲公民健康的保护,提升疫情防范能力,并强化医疗体系。到目前为止,该倡议尚未引发重大争议。这可能是因为这一主题下的提议较为零散,且一般不被视为确定欧盟干预能使国家卫生政策受益领域的全面愿景的一部分。在本论文中,我们就制定更全面的政策内容和流程愿景提出了内容和流程方面的前进方向。在此过程中,我们并非在争论欧洲卫生联盟的必要性。我们认为现有的欧洲卫生联盟为现在及未来在欧盟层面协调、集中或统筹与卫生相关的法律、机构、政策及行动带来额外益处提供了契机。