Center of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Science and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
MSD Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil.
Parasit Vectors. 2024 Jan 8;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-06107-2.
The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of different treatment strategies using a new commercial formulation containing pour-on fluralaner on Rhipicephalus microplus infestation in cattle and in pastures in a tropical climate region where up to five generations of this tick species can occur per year.
Forty-five naturally infested cattle were divided into three experimental groups: T01, treated with fluralaner (2.5 mg/kg) pour-on every 42 days; T02, the cattle received the first treatment with fluralaner on Day 0 but the next treatment involved a weekly visual evaluation; T03, control, received palliative treatment with a spray formulation when the group mean was ≥ 30 ticks. Counts of female R. microplus were performed weekly until day 343, and larval counts on pasture were performed on Days 0, 30, and 60 and every 30 days until Day 330.
Using fluralaner, six applications were performed in Group T01, and four were performed in Group T02. In the control group (T03), it was necessary to perform eight palliative acaricide treatments with the spray formulation. The animals in T01 and T02 showed lower mean tick counts (p ≤ 0.05) than the control group (T03) on 28 and 27 of the 49 evaluated dates, respectively. In the paddock where the animals were kept as controls, the R. microplus larvae counts increased to 1458. In the paddocks where the animals were treated with fluralaner, the number was ≤ 19 per paddock during the study.
The different strategic treatment protocols performed with pour-on fluralaner (2.5 mg/kg) over a year in taurine cattle in a tropical region with a history of up to five annual generations of cattle ticks were effective, maintaining levels of R. microplus infestations in animals and in pastures close to zero in most of the study. Depending on the retreatment criterion adopted, the number of applications per year may be lower, resulting in a reduction in the mean cost of acaricide treatment per year and lower exposure of R. microplus populations to the active ingredient, resulting in lower resistance and selection pressure.
本研究旨在评估在热带气候地区使用含有外泼型氟虫腈的新型商业制剂对牛皮蝇蛆的不同治疗策略的效果,该地区每年可发生多达五代这种蜱。
将 45 头自然感染的牛分为三组进行实验:T01 组,每 42 天用氟虫腈(2.5mg/kg)外泼治疗;T02 组,牛在第 0 天接受第一次氟虫腈治疗,但下一次治疗涉及每周进行目视评估;T03 组,对照组,当组均值≥30 只时,用喷雾制剂进行姑息性治疗。每周对雌性 R. microplus 进行计数,直到第 343 天,第 0、30 和 60 天和第 330 天进行幼虫计数,之后每 30 天进行一次计数。
使用氟虫腈,T01 组进行了 6 次处理,T02 组进行了 4 次处理。在对照组(T03)中,需要用喷雾制剂进行 8 次姑息性杀蜱剂治疗。在 49 次评估日期中的 28 次和 27 次,T01 和 T02 组的平均蜱计数均低于对照组(T03)(p≤0.05)。在作为对照的牛舍中,R. microplus 幼虫计数增加到 1458 只。在使用氟虫腈治疗的牛舍中,在研究期间,每个牛舍的数量均≤19 只。
在热带地区,对有多达五代牛蜱的牛进行了为期一年的不同战略治疗方案,使用外泼型氟虫腈(2.5mg/kg)进行治疗,在大多数时间里,动物和牧场的牛皮蝇蛆感染率都接近零。根据采用的重新治疗标准,每年的应用次数可能会减少,从而降低每年杀蜱剂治疗的平均成本,并降低 R. microplus 种群对有效成分的暴露,从而降低抗药性和选择压力。