Schäfer Sarah K, von Boros Lisa, Schaubruch Lea M, Kunzler Angela M, Lindner Saskia, Koehler Friederike, Werner Tabea, Zappalà Federico, Helmreich Isabella, Wessa Michèle, Lieb Klaus, Tüscher Oliver
Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research, Mainz, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Diagnostics - Child and Adolescent Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Feb 8;7(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01017-8.
Societies are exposed to major challenges at an increasing pace. This underscores the need for preventive measures such as resilience promotion that should be available in time and without access barriers. Our systematic review summarizes evidence on digital resilience interventions, which have the potential to meet these demands. We searched five databases for randomized-controlled trials in non-clinical adult populations. Primary outcomes were mental distress, positive mental health, and resilience factors. Multilevel meta-analyses were performed to compare intervention and control groups at post-intervention and follow-up assessments. We identified 101 studies comprising 20,010 participants. Meta-analyses showed small favorable effects on mental distress, SMD = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.31, -0.18], positive mental health, SMD = 0.27, 95% CI [0.13, 0.40], and resilience factors, SMD = 0.31, 95% CI [0.21, 0.41]. Among middle-aged samples, older age was associated with more beneficial effects at follow-up, and effects were smaller for active control groups. Effects were comparable to those of face-to-face interventions and underline the potential of digital resilience interventions to prepare for future challenges.
社会正日益面临重大挑战。这凸显了采取预防措施的必要性,比如推广复原力,此类措施应及时提供且不存在获取障碍。我们的系统综述总结了关于数字复原力干预措施的证据,这些措施有潜力满足这些需求。我们在五个数据库中检索了针对非临床成年人群的随机对照试验。主要结果包括心理困扰、积极心理健康和复原力因素。进行了多层次荟萃分析,以在干预后和随访评估中比较干预组和对照组。我们识别出101项研究,涉及20,010名参与者。荟萃分析显示,对心理困扰有小的有利影响,标准化均数差(SMD)= -0.24,95%置信区间[-0.31, -0.18];对积极心理健康,SMD = 0.27,95%置信区间[0.13, 0.40];对复原力因素,SMD = 0.31,95%置信区间[0.21, 0.41]。在中年样本中,年龄较大与随访时更有益的效果相关,而对于积极对照组,效果较小。这些效果与面对面干预的效果相当,突显了数字复原力干预措施为应对未来挑战做好准备的潜力。