Bernardi Lorenzo, Roesel Raffaello, Aghayan Davit L, Majno-Hurst Pietro E, De Dosso Sara, Cristaudi Alessandra
Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.
Department of Surgery, Ringerike Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2024 Mar;124:102696. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102696. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
The use of preoperative or "neoadjuvant" chemotherapy (NAC) has long been controversial for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2023 guidelines on metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate a combination of surgical/technical and oncologic/prognostic criteria as the two determinants for allocating patients to NAC or upfront hepatectomy. However, surgical and technical criteria have evolved, and oncologic prognostic criteria date from the pre-modern chemotherapy era and lack prospective validation. The traditional literature is interpreted as not supporting the use of NAC because several studies fail to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival (OS) compared to upfront surgery; however, OS may not be the most appropriate endpoint to consider. Moreover, the commonly quoted studies against NAC contain many limitations that may explain why NAC failed to demonstrate its value. The query of the recent literature focused primarily on other aspects than OS, such as surgical technique, the impact of side effects of chemotherapy, the histological growth pattern of metastases, or the detection of circulating tumor DNA, shows data that support a more widespread use of NAC. These should prompt a critical reappraisal of the use of NAC, leading to a more precise selection of patients who could benefit from it.
对于可切除的结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM),术前或“新辅助”化疗(NAC)的应用长期以来一直存在争议。欧洲医学肿瘤学会(ESMO)2023年转移性结直肠癌(CRC)指南指出,手术/技术标准和肿瘤学/预后标准的结合是将患者分配至NAC或直接肝切除术的两个决定因素。然而,手术和技术标准已经发展,而肿瘤学预后标准可追溯到现代化疗时代之前,且缺乏前瞻性验证。传统文献被解读为不支持使用NAC,因为多项研究未能证明与直接手术相比,NAC在总生存期(OS)方面有获益;然而,OS可能不是最适合考虑的终点。此外,常被引用的反对NAC的研究存在许多局限性,这可能解释了为什么NAC未能证明其价值。近期文献的探讨主要集中在OS以外的其他方面,如手术技术、化疗副作用的影响、转移灶的组织学生长模式或循环肿瘤DNA的检测,这些数据支持更广泛地使用NAC。这些情况应促使对NAC的应用进行批判性重新评估,从而更精确地选择可能从中获益的患者。