Baillie Kirsten, Davies Helen E, Keat Samuel B K, Ladell Kristin, Miners Kelly L, Jones Samantha A, Mellou Ermioni, Toonen Erik J M, Price David A, Morgan B Paul, Zelek Wioleta M
Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Llandough, Penarth CF64 2XX, UK.
Med. 2024 Mar 8;5(3):239-253.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
Long COVID encompasses a heterogeneous set of ongoing symptoms that affect many individuals after recovery from infection with SARS-CoV-2. The underlying biological mechanisms nonetheless remain obscure, precluding accurate diagnosis and effective intervention. Complement dysregulation is a hallmark of acute COVID-19 but has not been investigated as a potential determinant of long COVID.
We quantified a series of complement proteins, including markers of activation and regulation, in plasma samples from healthy convalescent individuals with a confirmed history of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and age/ethnicity/sex/infection/vaccine-matched patients with long COVID.
Markers of classical (C1s-C1INH complex), alternative (Ba, iC3b), and terminal pathway (C5a, TCC) activation were significantly elevated in patients with long COVID. These markers in combination had a receiver operating characteristic predictive power of 0.794. Other complement proteins and regulators were also quantitatively different between healthy convalescent individuals and patients with long COVID. Generalized linear modeling further revealed that a clinically tractable combination of just four of these markers, namely the activation fragments iC3b, TCC, Ba, and C5a, had a predictive power of 0.785.
These findings suggest that complement biomarkers could facilitate the diagnosis of long COVID and further suggest that currently available inhibitors of complement activation could be used to treat long COVID.
This work was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (COV-LT2-0041), the PolyBio Research Foundation, and the UK Dementia Research Institute.
新冠后遗症包含一系列不同的持续症状,这些症状在许多感染新冠病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)康复后的个体中出现。然而,其潜在的生物学机制仍不清楚,这妨碍了准确的诊断和有效的干预。补体失调是急性新冠肺炎的一个标志,但尚未作为新冠后遗症的潜在决定因素进行研究。
我们对一系列补体蛋白进行了定量分析,包括激活和调节标志物,这些样本来自有确诊新冠病毒2型感染病史的健康康复个体,以及年龄、种族、性别、感染情况、疫苗接种情况匹配的新冠后遗症患者的血浆样本。
新冠后遗症患者中,经典途径(C1s-C1INH复合物)、替代途径(Ba、iC3b)和终末途径(C5a、TCC)的激活标志物显著升高。这些标志物联合使用时,受试者工作特征曲线的预测能力为0.794。健康康复个体和新冠后遗症患者之间的其他补体蛋白和调节因子在数量上也存在差异。广义线性模型进一步显示,仅这四种标志物(即激活片段iC3b、TCC、Ba和C5a)的一个临床可行组合,预测能力为0.785。
这些发现表明,补体生物标志物有助于新冠后遗症的诊断,并进一步表明目前可用的补体激活抑制剂可用于治疗新冠后遗症。
这项工作由英国国家卫生研究院(COV-LT2-0041)、PolyBio研究基金会和英国痴呆症研究所资助。