Suppr超能文献

医疗费用覆盖不平等及其对高血压和糖尿病的影响:马来西亚农村社区的一项五年随访研究。

Healthcare cost coverage inequality and its impact on hypertension and diabetes: A five-year follow-up study in a Malaysian rural community.

作者信息

Folayan Adeola, Fatt Quek Kia, Cheong Mark Wing Loong, Su Tin Tin

机构信息

South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO), Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences Monash University Malaysia Jalan Lagoon Selatan Bandar Sunway Selangor Malaysia.

Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences Monash University Malaysia Jalan Lagoon Selatan Bandar Sunway Selangor Malaysia.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 15;7(2):e1880. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1880. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inequality in health care access is a socioeconomic driver for non-communicable disease related risk factors. This study examined the inequality trend in healthcare cost coverage (HCC) compared to private health insurance (PHI) coverage, a subtype of HCC, over 5 years. The study will also determine the association between HCC (and PHI) and the status of hypertension and diabetes diagnosis.

METHOD

The rich-poor ratio, concentration curve and concentration index were derived to determine the level of inequality. Furthermore, logistic regression was done to determine the association between HCC and the status of hypertension and diabetes.

RESULTS

The PHI group (rich-poor ratio: 1.4 [rich: 454, poor: 314] and 2.6 [rich: 375, poor: 142]; concentration index: 0.123 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.093-0.153] and 0.144 [95% CI: 0.109-0.178] in 2013 and 2018, respectively) has relatively higher inequality compared with the HCC group (rich-poor ratio: 0.9 [rich: 307, poor: 337] and 1.1 [rich: 511, poor: 475]; concentration index: -0.027 [95% CI: -0.053 to -0.000] and -0.014 [95% CI: -0.033 to 0.006] in 2013 and 2018, receptively). Contrasting to the observation with the HCC group, PHI was associated with higher odds for hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.252,  = 0.01, 95% CI: 1.051-1.493) and diabetes (aOR = 1.287,  = 0.02, 95% CI: 1.041-1.590) in 2018.

CONCLUSION

Over 5 years, the inequality in PHI coverage remained higher compared with HCC, which suggests that the rich enjoyed private healthcare more. Furthermore, those with PHI were more likely to report known hypertension and diabetes in 2018. It is reasonable to assume that those with PHI are more likely to have earlier diagnoses compared to others and are more likely to be aware of their condition. Policymakers need to identify strategies that can narrow the existing gap in quality and type of service between the private and public health sectors.

摘要

背景与目的

医疗保健可及性方面的不平等是与非传染性疾病相关风险因素的社会经济驱动因素。本研究考察了5年间医疗费用覆盖(HCC)与作为HCC一种亚型的私人健康保险(PHI)覆盖相比的不平等趋势。该研究还将确定HCC(及PHI)与高血压和糖尿病诊断状况之间的关联。

方法

通过计算贫富比、集中曲线和集中指数来确定不平等程度。此外,进行逻辑回归以确定HCC与高血压和糖尿病状况之间的关联。

结果

2013年和2018年,PHI组(贫富比分别为:1.4[富人:454,穷人:314]和2.6[富人:375,穷人:142];集中指数分别为:0.123[95%置信区间,CI:0.093 - 0.153]和0.144[95%CI:0.109 - 0.178])与HCC组(贫富比分别为:0.9[富人:307,穷人:337]和1.1[富人:511,穷人:475];集中指数分别为:-0.027[95%CI:-0.053至-0.000]和-0.014[95%CI:-0.033至0.006])相比,不平等程度相对更高。与HCC组的观察结果相反,2018年PHI与高血压(调整优势比[aOR] = 1.252,P = 0.01,95%CI:1.051 - 1.493)和糖尿病(aOR = 1.287,P = 0.02,95%CI:1.041 - 1.590)的较高患病几率相关。

结论

在5年期间,PHI覆盖方面的不平等程度仍高于HCC,这表明富人更多地享受了私人医疗保健。此外,2018年拥有PHI的人更有可能报告已知的高血压和糖尿病。可以合理推测,与其他人相比,拥有PHI的人更有可能更早被诊断,并且更了解自己的病情。政策制定者需要确定能够缩小私人和公共卫生部门现有服务质量和类型差距的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b574/10867688/96161aae5f66/HSR2-7-e1880-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验