Urvi Desai, PhD, Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Avenue, 14th Floor, Boston, MA 02199, USA, Phone: +1-617-425-8315, Email:
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(2):320-328. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.28.
There is limited literature regarding the impact of differential rates of disease progression on longitudinal outcomes in individuals with early Alzheimer's disease (AD) and confirmed brain amyloid pathology.
To describe the underlying characteristics and long-term outcomes associated with different rates of disease progression among amyloid-positive individuals with early symptomatic AD.
Retrospective observational study.
Data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS) in the United States (06/2005-11/2021).
Individuals with a clinical assessment of mild cognitive impairment or dementia and Clinical Dementia Rating® Dementia Staging Instrument Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score 0.5-9.0 (inclusive; first visit defined as the index date) and confirmed amyloid positivity. Participants were stratified into No Progression (change ≤0), Slower Progression (0< change <2.0 points), Median Progression (2.0-point change), and Faster Progression (change >2.0 points) cohorts based on the observed distribution of changes in CDR-SB score between the index and first subsequent visit.
For each cohort, the functional and neuropsychiatric outcomes were described at index and each subsequent visit for up to five years, and least-square (LS) mean changes from baseline were estimated using linear mixed-effects models adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.
Among 1,263 participants included in the analysis, the mean±standard deviation (SD) age at index was 72.7±9.7 years and 55.3% were males. Demographic characteristics and comorbidity profiles at index were similar across cohorts. However, at index, the Faster Progression (N=279) cohort had higher CDR-SB and Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ) scores compared with the No Progression (N=474), Slower Progression (N=297), and Median Progression (N=213) cohorts. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, at year 5 after index the FAQ score increased by 23.6 points for Faster Progression cohort and 10.4, 15.8, and 19.2 points for the No, Slower, and Median Progression cohorts, respectively. The corresponding increases in Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) scores were 6.7 points for the Faster Progression cohort, and by 1.3, 3.1, and 8.3 points, for the No, Slower, and Median Progression cohorts, respectively.
Despite similar demographic and clinical profiles at baseline, amyloid-positive individuals with greater deterioration based on CDR-SB early in the AD trajectory continue to experience worse functional and behavioral outcomes over time than those with more gradual deterioration in this metric.
关于早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)和确诊的脑淀粉样蛋白病理患者中疾病进展速度差异对纵向结局的影响,相关文献有限。
描述淀粉样蛋白阳性的早期有症状 AD 患者中不同疾病进展速度的潜在特征和长期结局。
回顾性观察性研究。
美国国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心(NACC)统一数据集(UDS)的数据(06/2005-11/2021)。
有轻度认知障碍或痴呆的临床评估和临床痴呆评定量表®痴呆分期工具总分(CDR-SB)评分 0.5-9.0(含;首次就诊定义为索引日期)和确诊的淀粉样蛋白阳性。参与者根据 CDR-SB 评分在索引和首次后续就诊之间的观察到的变化分布,分层为无进展(变化≤0)、进展较慢(0<变化<2.0 分)、中位数进展(2.0 点变化)和进展较快(变化>2.0 分)队列。
对于每个队列,在索引和随后的每次就诊时描述功能和神经心理学结局,最长达五年,并使用线性混合效应模型调整基线人口统计学和临床特征,估计从基线的最小二乘(LS)均值变化。
在纳入分析的 1263 名参与者中,索引时的平均±标准偏差(SD)年龄为 72.7±9.7 岁,55.3%为男性。各队列的人口统计学特征和合并症特征在索引时相似。然而,在索引时,进展较快(N=279)队列的 CDR-SB 和功能评估问卷(FAQ)评分高于无进展(N=474)、进展较慢(N=297)和中位数进展(N=213)队列。调整基线特征后,在索引后 5 年,进展较快队列的 FAQ 评分增加了 23.6 分,无进展、进展较慢和中位数进展队列分别增加了 10.4、15.8 和 19.2 分。进展较快队列的神经精神问卷(NPI-Q)评分增加了 6.7 分,无进展、进展较慢和中位数进展队列分别增加了 1.3、3.1 和 8.3 分。
尽管基线的人口统计学和临床特征相似,但根据 AD 轨迹早期的 CDR-SB 恶化程度较高的淀粉样蛋白阳性患者,在该指标上的功能和行为结局随时间恶化程度比恶化程度逐渐的患者更严重。