Suppr超能文献

外科口罩和N95口罩对焦虑的影响。

Effect of Surgical Masks and N95 Respirators on Anxiety.

作者信息

Zhang Yan, Yang Qiongyao, Ma Qianru, Wu Yuanxiong, Wang Yue, Chen Chuanchuan, Yao Yitan, Feng Ziqiao, Yuan Xiaoping, Shi Shengya, Zhang Kai

机构信息

Department of Pneumology, Second People's Hospital of Anhui Province, Hefei, People's Republic of China.

Department of Psychiatry, Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Mar 8;20:551-559. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S447428. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Masks are designed to reduce the spread of airborne pathogens, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), although wearing a mask has some adverse effects. The primary objective of this study was to explore the effects of surgical masks and N95 respirators on patients diagnosed with anxiety.

METHODS

Subjects diagnosed with first-episode anxiety disorders were recruited from outpatient departments between February and July, 2023. A self-administered questionnaire was administered at baseline and at follow-up. The questionnaire addressed demographic information, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Subjects were divided into three groups (n=30 each): control (no mask); surgical mask; and N95 respirator. The Kruskal-Wallis test and repeated measures analysis of variance were used to examine associations between face mask use and emotion.

RESULTS

Ninety subjects completed the study, of whom 51 (56.67%) were male and 39 (43.33%) were female. Time and group effects were observed in HAM-A score among the 3 groups. After 4 weeks, mean (± SD) HAM-A score decreased from 32.63±13.37 to 28.07±9.33 in the control group, increased from 33.67±12.47 to 36.80±10.32 in the surgical mask group, and from 32.33±14.73 to 41.13±8.29 in the N95 respirator group, with no sex differences among the 3 groups. HAM-A score was significantly higher in the mask groups than that in the control group at follow-up. Only N95 respirator group exhibited significant time effects on HAM-D and ISI scores, with a decreasing trend in HAM-D score and an opposite trend in ISI score.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged mask use may exacerbate anxiety, especially among those wearing N95 respirator masks. In a post-pandemic environment, governments should improve public health beliefs regarding coronavirus disease 2019 and promote the safety of face mask use, thus reducing the physiological and psychological effects of improper mask use.

摘要

目的

口罩旨在减少空气传播病原体的传播,如严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2),尽管佩戴口罩有一些不良影响。本研究的主要目的是探讨外科口罩和N95口罩对诊断为焦虑症的患者的影响。

方法

2023年2月至7月从门诊招募首次发作焦虑症的受试者。在基线和随访时进行自我管理问卷调查。问卷涉及人口统计学信息、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)和失眠严重指数(ISI)。受试者分为三组(每组n = 30):对照组(不戴口罩);外科口罩组;N95口罩组。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和重复测量方差分析来检验口罩使用与情绪之间的关联。

结果

90名受试者完成了研究,其中51名(56.67%)为男性,39名(43.33%)为女性。在三组的HAM-A评分中观察到时间和组效应。4周后,对照组的平均(±标准差)HAM-A评分从32.63±13.37降至28.07±9.33,外科口罩组从33.67±12.47升至36.80±10.32,N95口罩组从32.33±14.73升至41.13±8.29,三组之间无性别差异。随访时,口罩组的HAM-A评分显著高于对照组。仅N95口罩组在HAM-D和ISI评分上表现出显著时间效应,HAM-D评分呈下降趋势而ISI评分呈相反趋势。

结论

长时间佩戴口罩可能会加重焦虑,尤其是佩戴N95口罩者。在疫情后环境中,政府应改善公众对2019冠状病毒病的健康认知,并促进口罩使用的安全性,从而减少不当佩戴口罩带来的生理和心理影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac4/10933521/ed38274a6c84/NDT-20-551-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验