Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Hunter-Bellevue School of Nursing, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY.
Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
J Perianesth Nurs. 2024 Aug;39(4):638-644.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2023.11.007. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
In response to a nationwide fentanyl shortage, our institution assessed whether changing our first-line postoperative intravenous opioid from fentanyl to hydromorphone impacted patient outcomes. The primary research aim was to evaluate the association between first-line opioid and rapidity of recovery.
The study team retrospectively obtained data on all consecutive patients extracted from the electronic medical record. The rapidity of recovery was defined as the time from entry into the postanesthesia care unit to the transition to Phase 2 for ambulatory extended recovery patients and as the length of total postanesthesia care unit stay for outpatients.
Following intent-to-treat-principles, we tested the association between study period and rapidity of recovery (a priori clinically meaningful difference: 20 minutes) using multivariable linear regression, adjusting for anesthesia type (general vs monitored anesthesia care), American Society of Anesthesiologst physical status (ASA) score (1-2 vs 3-4), age, service, robotic procedure, and surgery start time.
Ambulatory extended recovery patients treated in the hydromorphone period had, on average, a 0.25 minute (95% confidence interval [CI] -6.5, 7.0), nonstatistically significant (P > .9) longer time to transition. For outpatient procedures, those who received hydromorphone had, on average, 8.5-minute longer stays (95% CI 3.7-13, P < .001). Although we saw statistical evidence of an increased risk of resurgery associated with receiving hydromorphone (0.5%; 95% CI -0.1%, 1.0%; P = .039 on univariate analysis), the size of the estimate is clinically and biologically implausible and is most likely a chance finding related either to multiple testing or confounding.
The multidisciplinary team concluded that the increase in postoperative length of stay associated with hydromorphone was not clinically significant and the decrease waste of prefilled syringes outweighed the small potential increased risk of resurgery compared to the shorter-acting fentanyl. We will therefore use hydromorphone moving forward.
针对全国范围内芬太尼短缺的情况,本机构评估了将术后一线静脉用阿片类药物从芬太尼改为氢吗啡酮是否会影响患者结局。主要研究目的是评估一线阿片类药物与恢复速度之间的关联。
研究小组从电子病历中回顾性获取所有连续患者的数据。恢复速度定义为从进入麻醉后恢复室到可门诊延长恢复患者进入第 2 阶段的时间,以及门诊患者在麻醉后恢复室的总停留时间。
根据意向治疗原则,我们使用多变量线性回归测试了研究期间与恢复速度(预先设定的有临床意义的差异:20 分钟)之间的关联,调整了麻醉类型(全身麻醉与监测麻醉护理)、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况评分(1-2 分与 3-4 分)、年龄、科室、机器人手术和手术开始时间。
在氢吗啡酮治疗期间,可门诊延长恢复的患者平均延迟 0.25 分钟(95%置信区间 [CI] -6.5,7.0),差异无统计学意义(P>.9)。对于门诊手术,接受氢吗啡酮治疗的患者平均停留时间延长 8.5 分钟(95% CI 3.7-13,P<.001)。尽管我们观察到接受氢吗啡酮治疗与再次手术风险增加有关的统计学证据(0.5%;95% CI -0.1%,1.0%;P=0.039 为单因素分析),但估计值的大小在临床和生物学上是不合理的,最有可能是由于多次测试或混杂因素导致的偶然发现。
多学科团队得出结论,与氢吗啡酮相关的术后住院时间延长并不具有临床意义,且与作用时间较短的芬太尼相比,预充注射器的浪费增加的风险很小,而潜在再次手术的风险增加则可以忽略不计。因此,我们将在今后使用氢吗啡酮。