Nurse-Scientist, College of Nursing, University of Colorado, CO, USA.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2322194. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2322194. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Obstetric violence has been documented throughout the world, yet this human rights issue has mostly been investigated in middle- and low-income countries where the intensity and brutality of abuse and mistreatment is more easily recognised as problematic. This integrative review aimed to analyse sources about obstetric violence in high-income countries with the objective of identifying gaps in the research, challenges to the study of obstetric violence, and solutions to framing research that meets those challenges. A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed and CINAHL databases from February to June 2022. Empirical and non-empirical sources, published in English, with no date restrictions, were retrieved. Citation searching was also done. Forty-six sources were included. Identified gaps in the research were: (a) scarce attention to obstetric violence in most high-income countries; (b) most US sources are non-scientific and from outside the healthcare disciplines; (c) inconsistencies in terminology; (d) most studies were conducted with samples of women who had given birth, with scant research about healthcare providers and obstetric violence, and (e) the association between obstetric violence and traumatic birth was under-recognised. Identified challenges to the study of obstetric violence were: (1) factors that enable and perpetuate obstetric violence are multilevel and nonlinear; (2) the phenomenon is contextually complex; and (3) blind spots from routinised harmful practices and normalised mistreatment can prevent healthcare providers and birthing people from recognising obstetric violence. A systems approach and complexity theory are guiding frameworks recommended as solutions to the challenges of studying and correcting obstetric violence.
产科暴力在全世界都有记录,但这一人权问题主要在中低收入国家进行调查,在这些国家,虐待和虐待的强度和残酷性更容易被认为是有问题的。本综合评论旨在分析高收入国家产科暴力的来源,目的是确定研究中的差距、研究产科暴力的挑战以及制定符合这些挑战的研究框架的解决方案。从 2022 年 2 月到 6 月,使用 PubMed 和 CINAHL 数据库进行了系统搜索。检索了发表在英语、无日期限制的实证和非实证来源。还进行了引文搜索。共纳入 46 项来源。研究中的差距包括:(a)大多数高收入国家对产科暴力关注甚少;(b)大多数美国来源是非科学的,且来自医疗保健学科之外;(c)术语不一致;(d)大多数研究都是在已经分娩的女性样本中进行的,关于医疗保健提供者和产科暴力的研究很少,以及(e)产科暴力与创伤性分娩之间的关联被低估了。研究产科暴力的挑战包括:(1)使产科暴力得以实施和持续存在的因素是多层次和非线性的;(2)该现象在背景上是复杂的;(3)由于例行的有害做法和正常化的虐待而产生的盲点可能会阻止医疗保健提供者和分娩者识别产科暴力。系统方法和复杂性理论是指导框架,被推荐为解决研究和纠正产科暴力的挑战的解决方案。