Adam Silke, Urman Aleksandra, Arlt Dorothee, Gil-Lopez Teresa, Makhortykh Mykola, Maier Michaela
University of Bern, Switzerland.
University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Communic Res. 2023 Mar;50(2):205-229. doi: 10.1177/00936502221127484.
We analyze short-term media trust changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, their ideological drivers and consequences based on panel data in German-speaking Switzerland. We thereby differentiate trust in political information from different types of traditional and non-traditional media. COVID-19 serves as a natural experiment, in which citizens' media trust at the outbreak of the crisis is compared with the same variables after the severe lockdown measures were lifted. Our data reveal that (1) media trust is consequential as it is associated with people's willingness to follow Covid-19 regulations; (2) media trust changes during the pandemic, with trust levels for most media decreasing, with the exception of public service broadcasting; (3) trust losses are hardly connected to ideological divides in Switzerland. Our findings highlight that public service broadcasting plays an exceptional role in the fight against a pandemic and that contrary to the US, no partisan trust divide occurs.
我们基于瑞士德语区的面板数据,分析了新冠疫情期间短期媒体信任度的变化、其意识形态驱动因素及后果。我们据此区分了对来自不同类型传统和非传统媒体的政治信息的信任度。新冠疫情充当了一项自然实验,在此实验中,将危机爆发时公民的媒体信任度与严格封锁措施解除后的相同变量进行比较。我们的数据显示:(1)媒体信任度很重要,因为它与人们遵守新冠疫情防控规定的意愿相关;(2)疫情期间媒体信任度发生变化,大多数媒体的信任度下降,但公共服务广播除外;(3)在瑞士,信任度的下降与意识形态分歧几乎没有关联。我们的研究结果突出表明,公共服务广播在抗击疫情中发挥着特殊作用,而且与美国不同,不存在党派信任分歧。