Laboratorio de Molecular Farming y Vacunas-UB6, Instituto Tecnológico de Chascomús (CONICET-UNSAM), Av. Intendente Marino Km 8.2, Chascomús, Provincia de Buenos Aires 7030, Argentina; Escuela de Bio y Nanotecnologías, Campus Miguelete, 25 de Mayo y Francia, San Martín, Provincia de Buenos Aires 1650, Argentina.
Centro de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares "Dr. Horacio E. Cingolani" (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, La Plata, Argentina.
Vaccine. 2024 May 22;42(14):3355-3364. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.036. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
To better understand the role of pHsp90 adjuvant in immune response modulation, we proposed the use of the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV2, the principal candidate in the design of subunit vaccines. We evaluated the humoral and cellular immune responses against RBD through the strategy "protein mixture" (Adjuvant + Antigen). The rRBD adjuvanted with rAtHsp81.2 group showed a higher increase of the anti-rRBD IgG1, while the rRBD adjuvanted with rNbHsp90.3 group showed a significant increase in anti-rRBD IgG2b/2a. These results were consistent with the cellular immune response analysis. Spleen cell cultures from rRBD + rNbHsp90.3-immunized mice showed significantly increased IFN-γ production. In contrast, spleen cell cultures from rRBD + rAtHsp81.2-immunized mice showed significantly increased IL-4 levels. Finally, vaccines adjuvanted with rNbHsp90.3 induced higher neutralizing antibody responses compared to those adjuvanted with rAtHsp81.2. To know whether both chaperones must form complexes to generate an effective immune response, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays. The results indicated that the greater neutralizing capacity observed in the rRBD adjuvanted with rNbHsp90.3 group would be given by the rRBD-rNbHsp90.3 interaction rather than by the quality of the immune response triggered by the adjuvants. These results, together with our previous results, provide a comparative benchmark of these two novel and safe vaccine adjuvants for their capacity to stimulate immunity to a subunit vaccine, demonstrating the capacity of adjuvanted SARS-CoV2 subunit vaccines. Furthermore, these results revealed differences in the ability to modulate the immune response between these two pHsp90s, highlighting the importance of adjuvant selection for future rational vaccine and adjuvant design.
为了更好地理解 pHsp90 佐剂在免疫调节中的作用,我们提出使用 SARS-CoV2 的 Spike 蛋白的受体结合域(RBD),这是亚单位疫苗设计的主要候选物。我们通过“蛋白质混合物”(佐剂+抗原)策略评估了针对 RBD 的体液和细胞免疫反应。rRBD 与 rAtHsp81.2 佐剂一起显示出更高的抗 rRBD IgG1 增加,而 rRBD 与 rNbHsp90.3 佐剂一起显示出抗 rRBD IgG2b/2a 的显著增加。这些结果与细胞免疫反应分析一致。来自 rRBD+rNbHsp90.3 免疫的小鼠的脾细胞培养物显示出 IFN-γ产生的显著增加。相比之下,来自 rRBD+rAtHsp81.2 免疫的小鼠的脾细胞培养物显示出 IL-4 水平的显著增加。最后,用 rNbHsp90.3 佐剂的疫苗诱导的中和抗体反应高于用 rAtHsp81.2 佐剂的疫苗。为了知道这两种伴侣蛋白是否必须形成复合物才能产生有效的免疫反应,我们进行了共免疫沉淀(co-IP)实验。结果表明,在用 rNbHsp90.3 佐剂的 rRBD 中观察到的更大的中和能力将归因于 rRBD-rNbHsp90.3 相互作用,而不是佐剂引发的免疫反应的质量。这些结果与我们之前的结果一起,为这两种新型安全疫苗佐剂提供了一个比较基准,以评估它们刺激亚单位疫苗免疫的能力,展示了佐剂 SARS-CoV2 亚单位疫苗的能力。此外,这些结果揭示了这两种 pHsp90 调节免疫反应能力的差异,突出了佐剂选择对于未来合理疫苗和佐剂设计的重要性。