Suppr超能文献

28-8 与 22C3 检测法检测 PD-L1 结果不一致与纳武利尤单抗联合化疗治疗的胃癌患者的结局相关。

Discordant PD-L1 results between 28-8 and 22C3 assays are associated with outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2024 Jul;27(4):819-826. doi: 10.1007/s10120-024-01500-x. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the concordance/discordance of PD-L1 staining results between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays and its impact on the efficacy outcomes of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 143 gastric cancer patients treated with first-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy whose PD-L1 results with both 28-8 and 22C3 assays were available. The concordance/discordance between these assays and the inter-observer variability were evaluated for PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) positivity. Discordant PD-L1 results were analyzed regarding survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The agreement rates and Cohen's kappa values between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays were 78.3% and 0.56 (for CPS ≥ 1), 81.8% and 0.60 (for CPS ≥ 5), and 88.8% and 0.66 (for CPS ≥ 10), respectively. Inter-observer variability, as represented by the intra-class correlation coefficient, was 0.89 and 0.88 for the 28-8 and 22C3 assays, respectively. With PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 defined as positive, 35 (24.5%) and 82 (57.3%) had concordantly positive and negative results, respectively, between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays, whereas 26 (18.2%) had discordant results. Progression-free survival was shorter for those who exhibited negatively concordant PD-L1 results and discordant PD-L1 positivity between the 28-8 and 22C3 assays relative to those with positively concordant PD-L1 results (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 assays by 28-8 and 22C3 showed suboptimal concordance, while inter-observer variability was not critical in advanced gastric cancer. Discordant PD-L1 results between 28-8 and 22C3 assays may be associated with unfavorable efficacy outcomes in patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

我们评估了 PD-L1 染色结果在 28-8 检测和 22C3 检测之间的一致性/差异性,以及其对接受纳武利尤单抗联合化疗治疗的晚期胃癌患者疗效结局的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 143 例接受一线纳武利尤单抗联合化疗治疗且两种 PD-L1 检测(28-8 检测和 22C3 检测)结果均可用的胃癌患者。评估了这两种检测之间的一致性/差异性和 PD-L1 联合阳性评分(CPS)阳性的观察者间变异性。分析了不一致的 PD-L1 结果与生存结局之间的关系。

结果

28-8 检测和 22C3 检测的结果一致性率和 Cohen's kappa 值分别为 78.3%和 0.56(CPS≥1)、81.8%和 0.60(CPS≥5)和 88.8%和 0.66(CPS≥10)。观察者间变异性,以组内相关系数表示,28-8 检测和 22C3 检测分别为 0.89 和 0.88。以 PD-L1 CPS≥5 定义为阳性,28-8 检测和 22C3 检测之间分别有 35 例(24.5%)和 82 例(57.3%)的结果一致阳性和阴性,而有 26 例(18.2%)的结果不一致。与 PD-L1 结果一致阳性的患者相比,PD-L1 结果阴性不一致和 28-8 检测与 22C3 检测之间 PD-L1 阳性不一致的患者无进展生存期更短(P=0.013)。

结论

28-8 检测和 22C3 检测的 PD-L1 检测结果一致性欠佳,而观察者间变异性在晚期胃癌中并不关键。28-8 检测与 22C3 检测之间的 PD-L1 检测结果不一致可能与接受纳武利尤单抗联合化疗治疗的患者疗效结局不佳有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验