Suppr超能文献

临床环境中人工智能工具的采购、整合、监测和评估框架:一项系统综述。

Frameworks for procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical settings: A systematic review.

作者信息

Khan Sarim Dawar, Hoodbhoy Zahra, Raja Mohummad Hassan Raza, Kim Jee Young, Hogg Henry David Jeffry, Manji Afshan Anwar Ali, Gulamali Freya, Hasan Alifia, Shaikh Asim, Tajuddin Salma, Khan Nida Saddaf, Patel Manesh R, Balu Suresh, Samad Zainab, Sendak Mark P

机构信息

CITRIC Health Data Science Centre, Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May 29;3(5):e0000514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000514. eCollection 2024 May.

Abstract

Research on the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in medicine has increased exponentially over the last few years but its implementation in clinical practice has not seen a commensurate increase with a lack of consensus on implementing and maintaining such tools. This systematic review aims to summarize frameworks focusing on procuring, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating AI tools in clinical practice. A comprehensive literature search, following PRSIMA guidelines was performed on MEDLINE, Wiley Cochrane, Scopus, and EBSCO databases, to identify and include articles recommending practices, frameworks or guidelines for AI procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation. From the included articles, data regarding study aim, use of a framework, rationale of the framework, details regarding AI implementation involving procurement, integration, monitoring, and evaluation were extracted. The extracted details were then mapped on to the Donabedian Plan, Do, Study, Act cycle domains. The search yielded 17,537 unique articles, out of which 47 were evaluated for inclusion based on their full texts and 25 articles were included in the review. Common themes extracted included transparency, feasibility of operation within existing workflows, integrating into existing workflows, validation of the tool using predefined performance indicators and improving the algorithm and/or adjusting the tool to improve performance. Among the four domains (Plan, Do, Study, Act) the most common domain was Plan (84%, n = 21), followed by Study (60%, n = 15), Do (52%, n = 13), & Act (24%, n = 6). Among 172 authors, only 1 (0.6%) was from a low-income country (LIC) and 2 (1.2%) were from lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Healthcare professionals cite the implementation of AI tools within clinical settings as challenging owing to low levels of evidence focusing on integration in the Do and Act domains. The current healthcare AI landscape calls for increased data sharing and knowledge translation to facilitate common goals and reap maximum clinical benefit.

摘要

在过去几年中,人工智能(AI)工具在医学领域的应用研究呈指数级增长,但由于在实施和维护此类工具方面缺乏共识,其在临床实践中的应用并未相应增加。本系统综述旨在总结专注于在临床实践中采购、实施、监测和评估人工智能工具的框架。按照PRISMA指南,在MEDLINE、Wiley Cochrane、Scopus和EBSCO数据库上进行了全面的文献检索,以识别并纳入推荐人工智能采购、整合、监测和评估的实践、框架或指南的文章。从纳入的文章中,提取了有关研究目的、框架使用情况、框架原理、涉及采购、整合、监测和评估的人工智能实施细节的数据。然后将提取的细节映射到多纳贝迪安计划(计划、执行、研究、行动循环领域)。检索共得到17537篇独特文章,其中47篇根据全文进行了纳入评估,25篇文章被纳入综述。提取的共同主题包括透明度、在现有工作流程内操作的可行性、融入现有工作流程、使用预定义性能指标对工具进行验证以及改进算法和/或调整工具以提高性能。在四个领域(计划、执行、研究、行动)中,最常见的领域是计划(84%,n = 21),其次是研究(60%,n = 15)、执行(52%,n = 13)和行动(24%,n = 6)。在172位作者中,只有1位(0.6%)来自低收入国家(LIC),2位(1.2%)来自中低收入国家(LMICs)。医疗保健专业人员认为,由于在执行和行动领域中专注于整合的证据水平较低,在临床环境中实施人工智能工具具有挑战性。当前的医疗保健人工智能格局要求加强数据共享和知识转化,以促进共同目标并获得最大的临床益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafc/11135672/a35881612c34/pdig.0000514.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验