Suppr超能文献

羟氯喹用于新型冠状病毒肺炎预防和临床评估的疗效及安全性:一项随机试验的更新荟萃分析

The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 prophylaxis and clinical assessment: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.

作者信息

Han Xudong, Shi Wei, Yang Ya

机构信息

Nursing Department, Dahua Hospital, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2024 May 31;16(5):2983-2993. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1043. Epub 2024 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease that affected tens of millions of people, upended the lives of countless individuals around the globe. The chloroquine (CQ) and its analogue hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were the most frequently cited as potential treatments and preventatives against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The primary aim of this investigation was to scrutinize the effectiveness and safety of HCQ for COVID-19 prevention and to present powerful evidence and reference for clinical practice.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid and the Cochrane COVID-19 Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched from inception to January 31, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) trials that included participants who were SARS-CoV-2 negative at the time of registration were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The intervention group took HCQ or CQ orally. The control group was not blinded by quinine or placebo. Pooled relative risk (RR) of SARS-CoV-2 infection, mortality, hospitalization, adverse events, and compliance were calculated. The software tools utilized for statistical analyses were Stata 14 and Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies including 7,825 participants were enrolled. Bias of individual studies were assessed as low risk. The pooled RR for SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.83] (z=-4.01, P<0.0001; I=11%). The pooled RR for hospitalization was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35-1.50) (z=0.87, P=0.39; I=0.0%). The pooled RR for mortality and adverse events were 3.26 (95% CI: 0.13-79.74) (z=0.72, P=0.47; I=0.0%) and 1.90 (95% CI: 1.20-3.02) (z=2.73, P=0.0063; I=94%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this meta-analysis indicated significant impact of HCQ on SARS-CoV-2 infection with higher risk of adverse events. These findings must be considered with caution, and further research is necessary to delineate the specific circumstances where HCQ may be effective for COVID-19 prevention.

摘要

背景

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)影响了数千万人,颠覆了全球无数人的生活。氯喹(CQ)及其类似物羟氯喹(HCQ)是最常被提及的针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的潜在治疗和预防药物。本研究的主要目的是仔细审查HCQ预防COVID-19的有效性和安全性,并为临床实践提供有力证据和参考。

方法

从创刊至2022年1月31日,系统检索了PubMed、Ovid和Cochrane COVID-19对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)。本荟萃分析纳入了登记时SARS-CoV-2呈阴性的参与者的随机对照试验(RCT)。干预组口服HCQ或CQ。对照组未设盲,采用奎宁或安慰剂。计算SARS-CoV-2感染、死亡率、住院率、不良事件和依从性的合并相对风险(RR)。用于统计分析的软件工具为Stata 14和Review Manager 5.3。

结果

共纳入9项研究,7825名参与者。各研究的偏倚评估为低风险。SARS-CoV-2感染的合并RR为0.75 [95%置信区间(CI):0.68 - 0.83](z = -4.01,P < 0.0001;I² = 11%)。住院的合并RR为0.72(95% CI:0.35 - 1.50)(z = 0.87,P = 0.39;I² = 0.0%)。死亡率和不良事件的合并RR分别为3.26(95% CI:0.13 - 79.74)(z = 0.72,P = 0.47;I² = 0.0%)和1.90(95% CI:1.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fed/11170382/5d5d786de842/jtd-16-05-2983-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验