Specialist Clinic of Orthodontics, Public Dental Service, Region Halland, Kungsbacka, Sweden.
Specialist Clinic of Orthodontics, Public Dental Service, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Aug 1;46(4). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae033.
While retention appliances are widely used in orthodontics, there is still no evidence-based consensus regarding the optimal type of appliance or time of retention.
To compare chairside rectangular chain retainers, which can be placed in one sitting, with conventional multi-stranded bonded retainers regarding their levels of stability, biological side effects, complications, and patient experiences.
A single-centre, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.
In total, 48 patients were included in this single-centre, randomized controlled trial conducted in Varberg, Region Halland, Sweden. The patients were randomized to two groups: the chairside rectangular chain retainer group, using the Ortho FlexTech retainer (OFT); and the conventional retainer group, using the 0.0195 Penta One multi-stranded spiral wire (PeO). The primary outcome was Little´s irregularity index (LII) evaluated at debond (T0) and at 3 months (T3) and 12 months (T12). The secondary outcomes were inter-canine distance (ICD), plaque index (PI), calculus index (CI), bleeding on probing (BoP), and caries, evaluated at T0, T3, and T12, as well as patients' perceptions, evaluated at T3 and T12, and technical complications that were registered throughout the study period. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for continuous variables for inter-group comparisons, and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for intra-group comparisons.
There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding LII, biological side effects, technical complications, or patients' experiences. However, there was a small but statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the maintenance of the ICD. Within the OFT group, there was a significant increase in CI, and within the PeO group, there was a significant increase in BoP.
In terms of clinical relevance, the chairside rectangular chain retainer and the conventional multi-stranded spiral wire provide similar outcomes with respect to the stability of alignment, biological side-effects, technical complications, and patients' experiences short-term.
VGFOUreg-929962. Keywords: Orthodontic retainers; fixed retainers; retention; stability.
虽然保持器在正畸治疗中被广泛应用,但目前仍没有关于最佳保持器类型或保持时间的循证共识。
比较可在一次就诊中放置的椅旁矩形链保持器与传统多股结扎保持器,以评估其稳定性、生物学副作用、并发症和患者体验。
这是一项在瑞典哈兰省瓦尔贝里进行的单中心、双臂、平行组随机对照试验。
共纳入 48 名患者,随机分为两组:椅旁矩形链保持器组,使用 Ortho FlexTech 保持器(OFT);传统保持器组,使用 0.0195 Penta One 多股螺旋丝(PeO)。主要结局指标是使用 Little 不整齐指数(LII)评估的黏结去除时(T0)、3 个月(T3)和 12 个月(T12)的结果。次要结局指标包括尖牙间距离(ICD)、菌斑指数(PI)、牙石指数(CI)、探诊出血(BoP)和龋齿,评估时间点为 T0、T3 和 T12,以及患者感知,评估时间点为 T3 和 T12,以及整个研究期间记录的技术并发症。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行组间比较的连续变量,使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行组内比较。
两组之间在 LII、生物学副作用、技术并发症或患者体验方面均无统计学差异。然而,两组之间在 ICD 的维持方面存在微小但具有统计学意义的差异。在 OFT 组中,CI 显著增加,而在 PeO 组中,BoP 显著增加。
从临床相关性来看,椅旁矩形链保持器和传统多股螺旋丝在保持牙列的稳定性、生物学副作用、技术并发症和患者体验方面具有相似的短期效果。
VGFOUreg-929962。关键词:正畸保持器;固定保持器;保持;稳定性。