Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics III, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
World J Pediatr. 2024 Sep;20(9):915-924. doi: 10.1007/s12519-024-00829-8. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
Childhood cancer entails a heavy burden for patients and their families. Recent advances in overall survival rates have increasingly brought long-term quality of life into focus. Animal-assisted activities (AAAs) have long been hypothesized to alleviate the burden on pediatric patients and their peers in the hospital setting. However, their use in inpatient pediatric oncology has been a sensitive issue mainly due to the fear of infections, resulting in a lack of studies. This study presents data on the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of AAAs from a single German center.
Between 2018 and 2022, 60 patients (median age = 10.3 years) diagnosed with malignancy and undergoing treatment were visited by an intervention dog (total visits = 100). Patients were screened for infections as per hospital policy, with additional microbiological testing performed based on symptoms. The dog was screened for human pathogens and zoonoses. Microbial data and hospitalizations were analyzed from two months prior to the first visit until two months after the last visit. Acceptance of being in the hospital, both with and without planned animal-assisted interventions and pre- and post-intervention state stress, were measured using a validated visual analogue scale (0-10).
Patients benefited from AAAs, showing increased acceptance of being in the hospital (median: 7.25 vs. 4.50, P < 0.001) and decreased median state stress ratings one hour after the visit compared to one hour before the visit (1.00 vs. 4.25, P < 0.001). The intervention did not result in an increased number of infections or unplanned hospitalizations, and no zoonoses were detected. All microbial screening tests of the dog were negative.
AAAs with visiting dogs in inpatient pediatric oncology are feasible and safe. Although they hold promise for enhancing patients' well-being, further prospective studies are needed. Supplementary file 2 (MP4 240076 KB).
儿童癌症给患者及其家庭带来了沉重的负担。近年来,整体生存率的提高使得人们越来越关注长期生活质量。动物辅助活动(AAA)长期以来一直被认为可以减轻儿科患者及其在医院环境中的同龄人的负担。然而,由于担心感染,AAA 在住院儿科肿瘤学中的应用一直是一个敏感问题,导致研究较少。本研究介绍了来自德国单一中心的 AAA 的可行性、安全性和疗效数据。
2018 年至 2022 年间,60 名(中位年龄=10.3 岁)诊断患有恶性肿瘤并正在接受治疗的患者接受了干预犬的访问(总访问次数=100)。根据医院政策对患者进行感染筛查,并根据症状进行额外的微生物学检测。对狗进行了人类病原体和人畜共患病筛查。从第一次就诊前两个月到最后一次就诊后两个月分析微生物数据和住院情况。使用经过验证的视觉模拟量表(0-10)评估在医院的接受程度,包括有无计划的动物辅助干预以及干预前后的状态应激。
患者从 AAA 中受益,表现出对住院的接受度增加(中位数:7.25 比 4.50,P<0.001),并且与就诊前一小时相比,就诊后一小时的状态应激评分中位数降低(1.00 比 4.25,P<0.001)。干预并未导致感染或非计划住院人数增加,也未发现人畜共患病。狗的所有微生物筛查检测均为阴性。
在住院儿科肿瘤学中使用来访犬的 AAA 是可行且安全的。尽管它们有望提高患者的幸福感,但仍需要进一步的前瞻性研究。补充文件 2(MP4 240076 KB)。